GAO finds Elon Musk’s DOGE inflated claims of $110 billion in savings for federal government

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/06/doge-elon-musk-gao-government-cost-cuts.html

Elon Musk’s DOGE promised to slash $2 trillion in federal spending and to make the federal workforce lean and efficient. But even the cost savings it has claimed in an online “Wall of Receipts” of the smaller amount of $110 billion didn’t check out, according to a report the Government Accountability Office published Thursday.

埃隆·马斯克 (Elon Musk) 的 DOGE 承诺削减 2 万亿美元的联邦支出，并使联邦劳动力精简高效。但根据政府问责办公室周四发布的一份报告，即使是在网上“收据墙”中声称的 1100 亿美元的成本节省也没有得到证实。

The GAO evaluated $110 billion of savings DOGE claimed on a website with its “Wall of Receipts” from cuts including federal contracts, grants and leases. The GAO said it found multiple “issues limiting the transparency and reliability of these reported savings.” Including additional categories beyond contracts, grants, and leases, DOGE tallied $215 billion in cuts, the GAO said.

美国政府问责局评估了 DOGE 在网站上声称的 1100 亿美元的节省，并通过其“收据墙”削减了联邦合同、拨款和租赁等费用。美国政府问责局表示，它发现了多个“限制这些报告的节省的透明度和可靠性的问题”。 GAO 表示，包括合同、赠款和租赁之外的其他类别，DOGE 总计削减了 2150 亿美元。

The findings further undercut claims by Musk and President Donald Trump that they have made meaningful cuts in government spending and call into question the effects of the DOGE effort that slashed federal spending with little notice to agencies and slashed hundreds of thousands of government jobs.

这些调查结果进一步削弱了马斯克和唐纳德·特朗普总统关于他们已大幅削减政府支出的说法，并让人质疑 DOGE 在几乎没有通知各机构的情况下削减联邦支出并削减数十万政府工作岗位的效果。

The GAO found that of the 13,476 contracts DOGE claimed it terminated, “no termination action” was taken on 2,503 of them. The report also noted DOGE had claimed $113 million in savings from cuts to 264 leases, but GAO found that information overstated the savings. The leases cut and referenced on DOGE’s website “actually summed to $53.5 million” in savings, the report found. Of the 264 leases, about 108 were already in the termination process before DOGE was formed after Trump began his second term as president, the GAO report also said.

GAO 发现，在 DOGE 声称终止的 13,476 份合同中，其中 2,503 份“没有采取终止行动”。该报告还指出，DOGE 声称通过削减 264 份租赁合同节省了 1.13 亿美元，但 GAO 发现该信息夸大了节省的金额。报告发现，DOGE 网站上提到的租赁削减“实际上节省了 5350 万美元”。 GAO 的报告还称，在特朗普开始第二个总统任期后，在 DOGE 成立之前，这 264 份租约中约有 108 份已经进入终止程序。

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/news/1786078599090939.gif

The report was requested last year by Sens. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) who are, respectively, ranking members of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, and of the panel’s investigations subcommittee.

去年，参议员加里·彼得斯（密歇根州民主党人）和理查德·布卢门撒尔（康涅狄格州民主党人）分别是参议院国土安全和政府事务委员会以及该小组调查小组委员会的高级成员，要求提供这份报告。

The GAO is recommending that the DOGE website should prominently caution readers that the site has data-quality problems and other limitations and is therefore not a reliable source of information.

美国政府问责局建议 DOGE 网站应突出提醒读者，该网站存在数据质量问题和其他限制，因此不是可靠的信息来源。

In their review, the GAO said it checked DOGE’s Wall of Receipts claims about cut contracts, grants, and leases from Jan. 20, 2025, when Trump took office, through July 7, 2026, three days after DOGE announced on social media it had wound down. The GAO said it compared DOGE reporting to official data from publicly available federal databases.

美国政府问责局在审查中表示，它检查了 DOGE 的“收据墙”有关从特朗普上任之日起 2025 年 1 月 20 日到 2026 年 7 月 7 日（即 DOGE 在社交媒体上宣布关闭的三天后）削减合同、拨款和租赁的说法。美国政府问责局表示，已将 DOGE 的报告与公开的联邦数据库中的官方数据进行了比较。

The GAO said DOGE did not respond to the its requests for information and interviews.

美国政府问责局表示，DOGE 没有回应其提供信息和采访的要求。

“Everyone supports rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government, but DOGE was a slapdash and deceptive effort that misled the American people while doing real damage to the government’s ability to serve them,” Peters said in a statement.

彼得斯在一份声明中表示：“每个人都支持根除联邦政府中的浪费、欺诈和滥用职权，但 DOGE 是一项草率且具有欺骗性的努力，它误导了美国人民，同时对政府为他们服务的能力造成了真正的损害。”

Musk and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CNBC on the GAO report.

马斯克和白宫没有立即回应 CNBC 对 GAO 报告发表评论的请求。

Yeah no shit. Anyone who isn’t a serial billionaire fart sniffer could see that.

是啊，没什么。任何不是连续亿万富翁嗅屁者的人都可以看到这一点。

>>1527944

Well guys, we did it. We saved 50 million, and in return we spent that money within about 2 hours of Trump's Iran war starting. Oh, and we also indirectly killed over 700k people in counting by cutting off their aide and severely fucked up several US industries in the process.

好吧，伙计们，我们做到了。我们节省了 5000 万美元，作为回报，我们在特朗普发动伊朗战争后大约 2 小时内就花掉了这笔钱。哦，我们还通过切断他们的助手间接杀死了超过 70 万人，并在此过程中严重搞砸了美国的几个行业。

Unironically Musk should face the death penalty for this.

讽刺的是，马斯克应该因此面临死刑。

>>1528010

And the psychopathic toddlers, like big balls, that he appointed to feed people's lives into a woodchipper. And the dude who empowered him in exchange for letting him buy the last election for him. All of them should be fed into a wood chipper for the unimaginable cruelty they've so flippantly inflicted on so many people, and it wouldn't be a tenth of what they deserved.

还有那些像大球一样的精神变态的幼儿，他指定将人们的生命喂进伐木机。还有那个赋予他权力以换取他为他购买最后一次选举的家伙。他们所有人都应该被送进木材削片机，因为他们如此轻率地对这么多人造成了难以想象的残酷，而且这还不到他们应得的十分之一。

And yeah, the damage goes so far beyond those 700k people, as horrific as those deaths of mostly children are. It helped control infectious disease, which is why we are having one of the worst ebola outbreaks in history right now, and made third world countries suck less, so you had fewer refugees. If you think about this purely from a position of selfishness, we are in a much worse position than we would have been if we continued to provide aide across the world.

是的，造成的损失远远超出了 70 万人的范围，而且死亡人数大部分是儿童，同样可怕。它有助于控制传染病，这就是为什么我们现在正在经历历史上最严重的埃博拉疫情之一，并让第三世界国家减少了负担，因此难民也减少了。如果你纯粹从自私的角度考虑这一点，那么我们的处境比我们继续在世界各地提供援助时的处境要糟糕得多。

>>1527944

It’s a sad state of affairs when someone as vastly incompetent and genuinely repulsive as Elon Musk is given any kind of authority. The only cuts he successfully made were to Americas global reputation

当埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）这样无能且令人厌恶的人被授予任何形式的权力时，这是一种可悲的情况。他唯一成功的削减是美国的全球声誉

>>1528010

It's like California saving millions of pounds of carbon over years and that being negated in a single California forest fire

这就像加州多年来节省了数百万磅的碳，但加州的一场森林火灾却抵消了这一成果

Europe was so concerned about releasing greenhouse gases until they blew up Nord Stream 2 and released decades worth of greenhouse gas emissions in a single explosion

欧洲非常担心释放温室气体，直到他们炸毁了北溪2号，并在一次爆炸中释放了数十年的温室气体排放量

>>1528061

Not even remotely comparable.

甚至无法相提并论。

>>1528061

Do you not understand that if you reduce factory/ commercial greenhouse gas emissions over 10 years, and then there's a massive forest fire, that you still reduced emissions for 10 years?

你难道不明白，如果你减少工厂/商业温室气体排放10年，然后发生大规模森林火灾，你仍然减少了10年的排放吗？

Like, it's not that the forest fire undid all your work. If you didn't do the work you'd have the emissions you prevented and the forest fire emissions.

就像，森林大火并不是毁掉了你所有的工作。如果你不做这项工作，你就会得到你阻止的排放和森林火灾排放。

I feel like I'm still moving too fast for your retarded ass.

我觉得我对你这个弱智来说还是太快了。

So if you have ONE THING. And you have ONE MORE THING. Then you have TWO things... Forest fires are ONE THING. Commercial emissions are ONE THING.

所以如果你有一件事。你还有一件事。那么你有两件事......森林火灾是一件事。商业排放是一回事。

You following, or do I need to sound it out for you? Do you need some pictures?

你跟在后面，还是需要我替你听听？你需要一些照片吗？

>>1528383

If you spend 10 years cleaning up 100 tons of plastic pollution, and then some Indian family dumps 100 tons of plastic into the local river, they negated all the good work you did. There's still 100 tons of plastic in the river. If you did 0 cleaning and prevented the Indian family from coming here and dumping trash you would have accomplished the same outcome, there would be the same amount of trash

如果你花10年时间清理100吨塑料污染，然后一些印度家庭将100吨塑料倾倒到当地河流中，他们就否定了你所做的所有善工。河里还有100吨塑料。如果你做了零清洁并阻止印度家庭来这里倾倒垃圾，你也会达到同样的结果，会有同样数量的垃圾

>>1528407

Insane strawman. Also please explain a full proof way of stopping fires in a fucking tinderbox like California.

疯狂的稻草人。还请解释一下在像加利福尼亚这样的易燃物中阻止火灾的完整证明方法。

>>1528411

Why are you allowing the conservatives to use their Russian masters tactics, again, on /news/, again to derail threads that show how conservationism is a failure, again?

为什么你允许保守派再次在/新闻/上使用他们的俄罗斯大师策略，再次破坏表明保护主义如何失败的线索？

Clearly this can be offset by just seizing the 110 billion from Musk's own pockets.

显然，只要从马斯克自己的口袋里没收这 1100 亿美元就可以抵消这一点。

>>1527944

>DOGE failed

>DOGE失败

>Only saved billions

>仅节省了数十亿

Darn.

Esl shill is gobbling billionaire knobs again

ESL 希尔再次吞噬亿万富翁的旋钮

>>1528415

Read the article retard; they didn't even save a billion. The actual "savings" is estimated to only be a few million, and even among those half of the things they cut were already in the process of being terminated before Trump even took office.

阅读延迟文章；他们甚至没有节省十亿美元。实际“节省”的估计只有几百万，而且其中一半在特朗普上任之前就已经处于终止状态。

>>1528413

Russians didn't invent shitty analogies and it's not some Russian master tactic

俄罗斯人并没有发明糟糕的类比，这也不是什么俄罗斯大师的策略

>>1528421

Are we going to also casually overlook the amount of extra money that needed to be spent because some of the cuts were so retarded they did more economic harm than good?

我们是否也会随意忽视需要花费的额外资金数额，因为某些削减措施进展缓慢，对经济造成的弊大于利？

>>1528429

Actually it is when their objective is to both sides everything to cover for their own crimes. Which they're doing right now

事实上，他们的目标是让双方尽一切努力掩盖自己的罪行。他们现在正在做的事

>>1528453

Oh if we factor that in even if we took their "110 billion" estimate at face value this whole program was still a net loss of money.

哦，如果我们考虑到这一点，即使我们按照表面价值计算“1100 亿”，整个计划仍然是净亏损。

>>1527944

aint no way!

没办法啊！

>>1528421

It actually says nothing about the actual estimated savings.

它实际上没有提及实际估计的节省量。

The numbers are 110-215 billion currently.

目前这个数字是110-2150亿。

What you're stupid gay ass thinks is the total savings:

你这个愚蠢的同性恋所认为的是总节省：

>about $15.3 million of the total $53.5 million in savings, were already in process for termination when DOGE was established.

> DOGE 成立时，5,350 万美元节省总额中的约 1,530 万美元已准备终止。

So it only saved 35-ish million on leases and claimed an amount of 15 million that was expiring without action from DOGE (though one could possibly ask if those were expiring with a denied option to renew, but whatevs).

因此，它只节省了 3500 万左右的租约，并索赔了 1500 万的租约，这些租约在 DOGE 没有采取任何行动的情况下就将到期（尽管人们可能会问这些租约是否已到期且续约选项被拒绝，但又怎样）。

Lern2red fagot..

Lern2红基佬..

>>1528506

And to spell it out, since I feel the need to do so for liggeral trashcans, the leases were only a small portion of the savings claimed.

需要说明的是，由于我觉得有必要对 liggeral 垃圾桶这样做，所以租赁费用只占所声称节省的一小部分。

110 billion was the number tallied by DOGE, so if that's correct (and it may not be, which is the point of the article for those of us capable of reading comprehension) 110 billion minus 15 million is still pretty damned close to 110 billion.

1100 亿是 DOGE 统计的数字，所以如果这是正确的（也可能不正确，这就是我们这些有阅读理解能力的人这篇文章的重点）1100 亿减去 1500 万仍然非常接近 1100 亿。

>>1528518

you're slobbering, esl shill

你在流口水，ESL 骗子

>>1528520

Why can't 4chan get rid of this bot?

为什么 4chan 无法摆脱这个机器人？

Fake engagement bot is annoying.

虚假的订婚机器人很烦人。

>>1528506

>>1528518

DOGE literally cost more than it "saved" and led to thousands of deaths and multiple small scale pandemics that are happening across the US. It is an objective failure of policy and probably one of the worst programs the US has ever done.

DOGE 的成本实际上超过了它“节省”的成本，并导致数千人死亡，并导致美国各地发生多起小规模流行病。这是客观上的政策失败，也可能是美国做过的最糟糕的计划之一。

>>1528521

do you dream about your nickname

你梦见自己的昵称吗

>>1528522

Don’t forget the various plane crashes after FAA funding was nonsensically cut

不要忘记美国联邦航空局的资金被无意义地削减后发生的各种飞机失事

>>1528526

>Increased by a margin of error.

> 增加一定的误差范围。

>Still down dramatically from the Obama era

>与奥巴马时代相比仍大​​幅下降

>Still down from all recorded records

> 距离所有记录还低

Interesting, tell me more about your stupid made up horseshit, faggot.

有趣的是，告诉我更多关于你愚蠢的胡言乱语的事情，基佬。

>>1528522

Meh, whatever. Go suck some billionaire cock, faggot.

嗯，不管怎样。去吸一些亿万富翁的鸡巴吧，基佬。

>>1528529

you're so hostile today esl shill. acne breakout?

你今天太有敌意了，esl shill。痤疮爆发？

>>1528522

>noooo I dont like your politics so I am opposed to your attempts to cut wasteful and senseless spending

>不，我不喜欢你的政治，所以我反对你试图削减浪费和无意义的支出

Mindbroken. Totally oneshotted.

心碎了。完全是单枪匹马。

>>1527944

Just FYI, GAO did not audit all of the savings. They just selected some cut projects and compared their estimates of savings against DOGE's estimates of savings.

仅供参考，GAO 并未审计所有节省的资金。他们只是选择了一些削减的项目，并将他们的节省估算与 DOGE 的节省估算进行了比较。

>>1528522

>DOGE literally cost more than it "saved"

>DOGE 的实际花费比它“节省”的还要多

Doubt it.

不太可能。

>People will die

>人会死

>Think of the children!!!

> 为孩子们着想！

Fagwit.

>>1528522

They hated him because he told them the truth.

他们讨厌他，因为他说了真话。

>>1528534

One-shot. Oneshotted isn't a word. But you'd know that if you didn't learn english in a classroom.

一击。 Oneshotted不是一个词。但如果你不是在教室里学英语，你就会知道这一点。

>There literally was no attempt to cut wasteful and senseless spending. By this logic if somebody told me they were going to change my car's oil and instead they repeatedly raped my asshole with a barbed wire condom, I'd be whining like a faggot about how you're not giving them credit for TRYING to change my car's oil.

>实际上并没有试图削减浪费和无意义的支出。按照这个逻辑，如果有人告诉我他们要换我车的机油，但他们却用铁丝网避孕套反复强奸我的屁眼，我会像个基佬一样抱怨你不相信他们试图换我车的机油。

But yeah, thanks for self-reporting.

但是，是的，感谢您的自我报告。

>>1528542

>doubt it

怀疑吧

yeah, of course you do, you're too much of a retarded faggot to actually look into it.

是的，你当然知道，你太弱智了，根本无法真正去研究它。

>>1528552

>Oneshotted isn't a word.

>Oneshotted 不是一个词。

Correct. It is, however, from an extremely good (and famous) shitpost. If you lived in the West, you would be at least tangentially familiar with the term as it carries some cultural weight.

正确的。然而，它来自一个非常好的（而且著名的​​）垃圾帖。如果您生活在西方，您至少会对这个术语有些熟悉，因为它具有一定的文化分量。

>weird sexually aggressive and rapey greentext

>奇怪的性侵犯和强奸绿色文本

You're brown.

你是棕色人种。

>>1528554

>you're too much of a retarded faggot to actually look into it.

>你真是个弱智，根本无法真正去调查它。

t. guy who didnt even read the article.

t。连文章都没读过的家伙。

GAO didn't even "look into it".

GAO甚至没有“调查”。

>>1528542

>Doubt it.

> 对此表示怀疑。

Proven actually.

事实证明。

>https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/07/31/2025/the-217-billion-blunder-new-psi-report-reveals-billions-in-taxpayer-dollars-squandered-by-doge

>https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doge-cuts-cost-135-billion-analysis-elon-musk-department-of-government-efficiency/

Between having to pay back illegally fired workers, the cuts to various social programs and contracts, and the productivity loss from the people they fired legally, estimates are we lost more than we saved.

在必须偿还非法解雇的工人、各种社会计划和合同的削减以及被合法解雇的人的生产力损失之间，估计我们损失的比我们节省的还要多。

>>People will die

>>人都会死

700,000 have died. These cuts actively killed people across the world who relied on US aide.

70万人死亡。这些削减实际上杀死了世界各地依赖美国援助的人们。

>>1528562

Your religion has some strange lore.

你们的宗教有一些奇怪的传说。

>>1527944

Didn't we know this back when they ran their "receipt" site and it was fairly easy to go through their list of ways they saved money and see it didn't add up to the number they had listed?

当他们运行“收据”网站时，我们是否不知道这一点，并且很容易浏览他们省钱的方式列表，发现它与他们列出的数字不符？

>>1528562

It's also not just that 700,000 people, mostly children, have died. That's horrible yes, but even if you look at it from the point of view of a right wing psychopath that only cares about things that directly effect us, it's awful. We gave up so much soft power by killing USAID, and destabilizing our neighbors has ripple effects that will directly make things worse for us too.

不仅仅是70万人（其中大部分是儿童）死亡。是的，这很可怕，但即使你从只关心直接影响我们的事情的右翼精神​​病患者的角度来看，这也是可怕的。我们通过扼杀美国国际开发署而放弃了如此多的软实力，而破坏我们邻国的稳定会产生连锁反应，这也会直接让我们的情况变得更糟。

>>1528570

Think of all the fucking roads and

想想所有该死的道路

pelosi rails we can build with the money though.

不过，我们可以用这笔钱建造佩洛西铁路。

Don't you like roads?

你不喜欢马路吗？

Anyway, the life of a liggeral involves ingesting activist filth and regurgitating it/ Therefore you've most likely been lied to or have been presented information lacking context as usual.

无论如何，一个 liggeral 的生活包括摄入激进分子的污秽并反刍它/因此你很可能像往常一样被欺骗或被提供缺乏上下文的信息。

esl shill is still trying to make fetch happen

ESL shill 仍在尝试让 fetch 发生

>>1528562

>Source is literally Sen. Blumethal

>来源实际上是 Sen. Blumethal

Is this bait?

这是在钓鱼吗？

>700,000 have died.

> 700,000 人死亡。

This is bait.

这是钓鱼贴。

>>1528570

>soft power

>软实力

Doesnt exist. Totally made up.

不存在。完全是编出来的。

>not wanting to borrow money to give aid to non-Americans makes you a psychopath

>不想借钱来援助非美国人会让你成为一个精神病患者

Okay.

>>1528585

spoken like a true esl shill

像真正的 ESL 骗子一样说话

>>1528585

>soft power

>软实力

>Doesnt exist. Totally made up.

>不存在。完全是编出来的。

Good lord you people are stupid.

老天爷，你们这群人真是蠢透了。

>>1528421

>The actual "savings" is estimated to only be a few million

>实际“节省”的估计只有几百万

>according to democrats

>根据民主党人的说法

>who stole the money in the first place

> 谁首先偷了钱

okay

>>1528588

>Good lord you people are stupid.

> 天哪，你们这些人真是愚蠢。

No, you're the idiot. "Soft power" is an idea from a guy called Joseph Nye who said that you can get two different people to like each other through mutual interests. Its not "spend trillions of dollars on Africa and get nothing in return".

不，你是个白痴。 “软实力”是一个叫约瑟夫·奈的人的想法，他说你可以通过共同的兴趣让两个不同的人彼此喜欢。这并不是“在非洲花费数万亿美元却得不到任何回报”。

>>1528421

>Read the article retard;

>阅读延迟文章；

You didnt read the article yourself. They didnt check all the DOGE cuts, just a "sample" and then extrapolated from that.

你自己没有读过这篇文章。他们没有检查所有的 DOGE 削减，只是检查一个“样本”，然后从中推断。

>>1528589

Good point.

说得对。

>>1528590

>>1528591

>>1528592

you sure are dedicated to being a spamming faggot tonight

今晚你肯定致力于成为一个垃圾邮件男同性恋

>>1528593

>/news/fag upset that his dead board is getting some action

>/news/fag 因他的死板正在采取一些行动而感到不安

>>1528594

good for you though, i hope you're flush with rupees or whatever it is you get from acting retarded all night. don't spend it all in one place

不过，这对你有好处，我希望你能赚到卢比，或者整夜表现迟钝而得到的任何东西。不要把所有的钱都花在一个地方

>>1528595

I'm sorry I've upset your hugbox.

很抱歉我打扰了你的抱抱箱。

>>1528598

i don't think you get paid for replying to nonexistent posts shill anon

我不认为你会因回复不存在的帖子而获得报酬

>>1528599

I dont get paid at all.

我根本没有得到报酬。

esl shill gets vodka rations in lieu of pay

ESL shill 得到伏特加口粮来代替工资

>>1528600

You don't get your paycheck for including '

您不会因为包含“而获得薪水”

"ESL" in your posts?

你的帖子里有“ESL”吗？

Shit, bro, it's the easiest paycheck ever.

妈的，兄弟，这是有史以来最简单的薪水。

Loser, why wouldn't you?

失败者，你为什么不呢？

>>1528590

>Its not "spend trillions of dollars on Africa and get nothing in return".

>这不是“在非洲花费数万亿美元却得不到任何回报”。

What we got in return was global respect, less refugees, and, oh right, thousands of children not being dead.

我们得到的回报是全球的尊重、更少的难民，以及，哦，对了，数以千计的儿童没有死亡。

>>1528607

OK, look, it's a put up or shut up moment here.

好吧，听着，这是一个要么忍耐要么闭嘴的时刻。

If you can show me that 700k people were killed by DOGE i will vote against Trump in the next election.

如果你能告诉我 70 万人被 DOGE 杀害，我将在下次选举中投票反对特朗普。

The terms are simple:

条款很简单：

1. no activist media websites shall be used as evidence facing me.

1. 任何维权媒体网站均不得作为我面对的证据。

2. no studies without hard data

2. 没有硬数据就没有研究

And I think that's pretty much it. the problem is: your claims are bogus and I'm sick of liggeral scams.

我想差不多就是这样了。问题是：你的说法是假的，我厌倦了这种骗局。

>>1528609

The person you're responding to didn't say 700k. It's weird but unsurprising that you fixate on a number you don't understand. That figure is a modeled estimate. What you're demanding would be impossible to produce: we don't have a counterfactual death tally showing which individual people would have survived if USAID funding hadn't been cut. There isn't some guy watching children who lost access to malaria treatment die and making marks on a fucking clipboard labeled “DOGE.”

您回复的人没有说 700k。你专注于一个你不理解的数字，这很奇怪，但并不奇怪。该数字是一个模型估计。你所要求的东西是不可能实现的：我们没有反事实的死亡统计数据来显示如果美国国际开发署的资金没有被削减，哪些人会幸存。没有人看着失去疟疾治疗机会的儿童死亡，并在标有“DOGE”的该死的剪贴板上做记号。

The underlying evidence isn't “activist media.” There is a peer-reviewed Lancet analysis using 21 years of USAID funding and mortality data across 133 countries. It finds a significant historical association between USAID funding and mortality, and researchers can use that relationship to estimate excess mortality resulting from the subsequent funding cuts.

潜在的证据不是“激进媒体”。 《柳叶刀》杂志使用 21 年美国国际开发署的资金和 133 个国家的死亡率数据进行了同行评审分析。它发现美国国际开发署的资金与死亡率之间存在显着的历史关联，研究人员可以利用这种关系来估计后续资金削减导致的超额死亡率。

If your objection is specifically that 700k isn't a directly observed death count, congratulations, that's a legitimate objection to presenting 700k as a literal body count. It is not evidence that the cuts had no mortality consequences. You're confusing an estimate of excess mortality with a census of corpses, which is an extraordinarily stupid way to misunderstand epidemiological modeling.

如果您的反对意见具体是 70 万不是直接观察到的死亡人数，那么恭喜您，这是对将 70 万作为字面死亡人数提出的合理反对意见。没有证据表明削减不会造成死亡后果。您将超额死亡率的估计与尸体普查混淆了，这是误解流行病学模型的极其愚蠢的方式。

Also, you don't get to vote. You aren't American.

另外，你没有投票权。你不是美国人。

>>1528609

>https://www.impactcounter.com/dashboard?view=table&sort=title&order=asc

>>1528622

>That figure is a modeled estimate.

>该数字是模型估计值。

Yes, it is bullshit, I know it, You know it.

是的，这是废话，我知道，你也知道。

>>1528634

No activist bullshit.

没有激进分子的废话。

>>1528644

>sea lioning intensifies

>海狮捕食加剧

>>1528644

>No activist bullshit.

>没有激进分子的废话。

Every source on there is backed by raw data.

那里的每个来源都有原始数据支持。

>>1528506

I found my office on the DOGE list, and while they threatened to take our office space away they eventually backed off, but kept it on the list as “savings” anyway. So who knows what was actually cancelled.

我发现我的办公室在 DOGE 名单上，虽然他们威胁要拿走我们的办公空间，但他们最终还是放弃了，但还是将其作为“储蓄”保留在名单上。所以谁知道实际上取消了什么。

Does anyone else think that the rise of pro-China sentiment online is a direct result of DOGE gutting USAID and the propaganda it supports? There’s no way the US government is giving away money solely for charity. I think the Chinese government saw an opportunity and used it to build soft power.

还有其他人认为网上亲中情绪的上升是 DOGE 破坏美国国际开发署及其支持的宣传的直接结果吗？美国政府不可能仅仅为了慈善事业而捐钱。我认为中国政府看到了机会并利用它来建设软实力。