>您随机想到一部电影或剪辑，但没有搜索它或在内容中提及它
>You think of a random movie or clip without searching it or mentioning it in a chat
>您随机想到一部电影或剪辑，但没有搜索它或在聊天中提及它
>YT literally suggest it the same day
>YT 确实在同一天建议了它
This happens too often to be coincidental
这种情况发生得太频繁，不可能是巧合
>inb4 schizo
>inb4 精神分裂症
>>109597569
its LLM
它的法学硕士
its can predict (You)
它可以预测（你）
>>109597569
It's called synchronicity, anon. It's the proof that CTMU is not just a theory.
这就是所谓的同步性。这证明了 CTMU 不仅仅是一个理论。
>>109597594
fpbp /thread
fpbp /线程
These algorithms have unironically become so good in some cases they can come to the same exact conclusions you do likely for the same exact reasons. i.e.
讽刺的是，这些算法在某些情况下变得如此出色，它们可以得出与您出于相同确切原因可能做出的完全相同的结论。 IE。
>you see something (a video, an article, a website, whatever) that's tracked
>您看到被跟踪的某些内容（视频、文章、网站等）
>YT algo directly feeds on it
>YT算法直接以它为食
>accurately predicts user x seeing y will lead them to think about z later because of association w
>准确预测用户 x 看到 y 后会因为关联 w 而导致他们考虑 z
Welcome to the brave new world guys.
欢迎来到勇敢新世界，伙计们。
>>109597569
you think your mind is unique? that your train of thought can't be engineered and guided? that you're so mysterious that you can't be read?
你认为你的想法很独特吗？你的思路无法被设计和引导？你是如此神秘以至于无法被读懂？
They know more about you than you do about yourself
他们比你更了解你自己
>thought recommendations thread
> 想法建议线程
>immediate predictive algorithm explanation replies
>即时预测算法讲解回复
>well that wraps up the topic
> 好了，这个话题就结束了
>>109597635
>that your train of thought can't be engineered and guided?
>你的思路无法被设计和引导？
Not to this degree of consistency this degree of accuracy.
没有达到这种程度的一致性和这种程度的准确性。
Anyone with half a brain would realize that remote mind reading is the more likely explanation. But implying that is strictly forbidden.
任何有半点大脑的人都会意识到远程读心术是更可能的解释。但暗示这是严格禁止的。
>>109597594
You know i wanted to say bs but i thought about it for a sec and honestly youre probably right and we know these llms have been around longer than we've been aware of
你知道我想说的是废话，但我想了一会儿，说实话，你可能是对的，我们知道这些 LLMS 存在的时间比我们意识到的要长
>>109597569
Have you had any tooth extractions? If so, when?
你有拔过牙吗？如果是的话，什么时候？
>>109597744
>Not to this degree of consistency this degree of accuracy.
> 没有达到这种程度的一致性和这种程度的准确性。
Why not?
为什么不？
Facebook already made a distinction that anyone who likes Pepsi over Cola has higher likelihood of being bipolar or schizophrenic back in early 2010s
早在 2010 年代初，Facebook 就已经做出了区分，任何喜欢百事可乐而不是可乐的人患躁郁症或精神分裂症的可能性更高
They even successfully modified local town elections in US by suggesting more of left leaning friend posts
他们甚至通过建议更多的左倾朋友帖子成功地修改了美国的当地城镇选举
You do not think that a good combination of words, videos and data can't guide you to think or act a certain way?
您不认为文字、视频和数据的良好结合不能指导您以某种方式思考或行动吗？
If you had enough of a self awareness you would come to realization that most of your thoughts aren't yours to begin with, they're just some book or quote or someones video analysis on the topic that you paraphrased and took upon as your own
如果你有足够的自我意识，你就会意识到你的大部分想法一开始就不是你自己的，它们只是一些书或引言或某人对你所解释的主题的视频分析，并把它当作你自己的想法
Now tell me honestly, when was the last time you had an original thought?
现在诚实地告诉我，你最后一次产生原创想法是什么时候？
when anon starts posting my thoughts
当匿名开始发表我的想法时
>>109597917
I should have specified I'm not OP and I'm not basing my claim on pre-defined youtube recommendations but from a litany of oddly specific recommendations across a multitude of websites.
我应该明确指出我不是OP，我的主张不是基于预定义的YouTube推荐，而是来自众多网站上的一连串奇怪的具体推荐。
Again, no, not to the degree of my experiences. Original thoughts? It's about oddly specific and random thoughts.
再说一次，不，根据我的经验，还没有达到这个程度。最初的想法？这是关于奇怪的具体和随机的想法。
>>109597635
OP here. I just thought of Whiplash, a movie i haven't seen or talked about in years. I'm washing the dishes, phone is in another room, i'm thinking about the "rushing or strolling" scene, just recalling it in my head. Opened yt two hours laters, suggestions shows a thumbnail with the exact fucking scene. wtf HOW?
在这里。我只是想到了《爆裂鼓手》，一部我已经很多年没有看过或谈论过的电影了。我正在洗碗，手机在另一个房间，我正在想着“匆匆或漫步”的场景，只是在脑海中回想。两个小时后打开，建议显示了一个缩略图，其中包含确切的他妈的场景。怎么办？
>>109597569
have you considered all of the variables that led you to thinking about that thing
你是否考虑过导致你思考那件事的所有变量
have you considered that the subject of your thoughts is not something that you can control?
你有没有想过，你的思想主题不是你能控制的？
>>109598110
My point is something this random and arbitrary can't be calculated and to this level of precision (two hours range). Sure, it's not happening daily but it happened way too many times for it to be coincidental. Either we live in a simulation or my wifi router scans my thoughts
我的观点是，这种随机和任意的事情无法计算到这种精度水平（两小时范围）。当然，这种情况不是每天都会发生，但它发生的次数太多了，不可能是巧合。要么我们生活在模拟中，要么我的无线路由器扫描我的想法
>>109597569
I was listening Ecco the Dolphin's OST 2 days ago, then I opened the orange site and there was a link to an article about Ecco the Dolphin.
两天前我在听Ecco the Dolphin的OST，然后我打开橙色网站，有一个关于Ecco the Dolphin的文章的链接。
>>109598437
....my point is that it's not random and arbitrary. you thought about it for a reason. since your phone can't read your thoughts yet, you VERY OBVIOUSLY were influenced to think about it by something else that you saw recently. which VERY OBVIOUSLY is the same reason why you got the ad or whatever.
....我的观点是，它不是随机的和任意的。你这么想是有原因的。由于您的手机还无法读取您的想法，因此您很明显受到最近看到的其他事物的影响而思考它。这显然与您收到广告或其他任何内容的原因相同。
like really can you fucking retards even use your brains anymore?
你们他妈的智障真的还能用脑子吗？
>>109598490
>you VERY OBVIOUSLY were influenced to think about it by something else that you saw recently
>你很明显受到最近看到的其他事情的影响而思考这个问题
You don't know that.
你不知道这一点。
besides the kike falseflagging in this thread and trying to make everyone else sound schizo and not him, they are making the audio spying WAY more blatant these days. I have normie friends on their phones pointing out youtube recommendations they get for topics they were just suggested on normiebook and reddit within literal seconds of flipping between the app tabs.
除了 kike 在这个线程中的虚假标记并试图让其他人听起来精神分裂而不是他之外，他们这些天让音频间谍变得更加明目张胆。我有一些普通朋友在他们的手机上指出，他们在应用程序选项卡之间切换的几秒钟之内就得到了 YouTube 推荐，内容涉及他们刚刚在 NormieBook 和 Reddit 上建议的主题。
also despite my best OPSEC practices i still get 4chan thread themed youtube recommendations here and there. games i've never played nor care to but saw a thread of now suddenly pops up heavily in my recommendations, etc. They're just being more bold now because nobody cares anymore.
另外，尽管我有最好的 OPSEC 实践，但我仍然到处得到 4chan 主题的 YouTube 推荐。我从未玩过也不关心的游戏，但看到现在突然在我的推荐中大量出现，等等。他们现在变得更加大胆，因为没有人再关心了。
>>109597569
if only this existed for old 4chan posts i try to find
如果旧的 4chan 帖子中只有这个存在的话，我试图找到
>>109598673
ya i do bc i'm smart
是的，我会的，因为我很聪明
>>109598490
>Influenced to think about 2014 oscarbait because... ??
> 受到影响去思考 2014 年奥斯卡贝，因为...??
And a magical algo somehow predicted this exact thought at the exact right time?SCIENCE AMIRITE HAHA
神奇的算法以某种方式在正确的时间预测了这个准确的想法？科学阿米里特哈哈
>>109598882
low IQ retards really can't read huh
智商低的智障真的看不懂啊
if you think i said anything about any algorithm making any predictions, you are just dumb
如果你认为我说了任何关于任何算法做出任何预测的事情，那你就是愚蠢的
>>109599019
tldr: some people suffer bizarre rng of not discovering something until 30 years later
tldr：有些人因为 30 年后才发现某些东西而遭受奇怪的困扰
>>109599038
thanks tldr-kun
谢谢tldr君
>>109598882
It wasn't even an ad, just a youtube suggestion to keep me engaged. Again, i did not verbalize this thought or searched for it on any device. What are the odds?
这甚至不是广告，只是一个让我参与的 YouTube 建议。再说一次，我没有用语言表达这个想法，也没有在任何设备上搜索它。几率有多大？
>>109599019
Sounds like gaslighting.
听起来像是煤气灯操纵。
>>109597744
>Not to this degree of consistency this degree of accuracy.
> 没有达到这种程度的一致性和这种程度的准确性。
Except you only notice it when it is this accurate, you don't realize that the algorithm was trying to do the same thing with the other dozen videos it recommended to you on the front page after time you visited the site. Only when it does accurately predict your thoughts do you realize how much of a normie brain you are.
除非你只有在它如此准确时才会注意到它，否则你不会意识到，在你访问该网站后，该算法正在尝试对它在首页上推荐给你的其他十几个视频做同样的事情。只有当它准确地预测你的想法时，你才会意识到你的大脑有多正常。
>>109599150
Wrong, I accounted for that as well.
错了，我也考虑到了这一点。
Still far too accurate.
还是太准确了。
>>109599160
Except, why were you thinking of a random movie clip in the first place? You have a certain set of subscriptions, interests, you are in a certain demographic, you have probably watched certain movies. You might have been looking at clips from other movies that have the same actors, directors, or producers, or studios, etc. So you think its unrelated to everything else, but the fact that you are interested in movies in the first place, is the biggest vector into your mind that the algorithm has to exploit you.
除了，你为什么首先想到一个随机的电影剪辑？你有一定的订阅、兴趣，你属于某个人群，你可能看过某些电影。你可能一直在看其他电影中具有相同演员、导演、制片人或工作室等的剪辑。所以你认为它与其他一切无关，但事实上你首先对电影感兴趣，这是算法必须利用你的最大向量。
And youtube movie or tv clips are one of the most popular forms of content the algorithm is pushing to everyone lately, its a form of advertising.
YouTube 电影或电视剪辑是该算法最近向每个人推送的最流行的内容形式之一，它是一种广告形式。
And how often do you spend thinking about movies each day?
您每天花多少时间思考电影？
The fact that coincidentially they triggered the neurons to make you think of a clip, by presenting associated information, and then they present the clip itself, is not a coincidence at all. The algorithm is not only trying to predict what you like, its trying to influence you to liking corporate products. Youtube makes its revenue from advertising, do you think that is only from ads? No, its also the content that they want you to watch. They are trying to do this to you all the time. And its not just the content that they want you to watch, to make them money. They also push specific content to push social and political agendas. So its not some great mystery or secret that a normie brain inundated with propoganda will inevitably think about the propanda the system is implanting. Your brain isn't only responding to the things you see, its also trying to predict what you will encounter, so it works both ways. The algorithm is trying to predict you, and you are trying to predict the algorithm, essentially your subconscious has been mated or pair bonded to digital algorithms.
事实上，他们巧合地触发神经元，通过呈现相关信息让你想起剪辑，然后它们呈现剪辑本身，这根本不是巧合。该算法不仅试图预测你喜欢什么，还试图影响你喜欢公司产品。 Youtube的收入来自于广告，你以为只有广告吗？不，这也是他们希望你观看的内容。他们一直试图对你这样做。他们想让你观看的内容不仅仅是为了给他们赚钱。他们还推出特定内容来推动社会和政治议程。因此，一个被宣传淹没的普通人大脑不可避免地会想到系统正在植入的宣传，这并不是什么巨大的谜团或秘密。您的大脑不仅会对您看到的事物做出反应，还会尝试预测您将遇到的事物，因此它是双向的。算法试图预测你，你也试图预测算法，本质上你的潜意识已经与数字算法配对或结合。
>>109599225
I don't see that as probable reason when I was recommended an obscure 3D animation of a very arbitrary mechanism that closely resembled something from my personal thought experiment.
当我被推荐一个晦涩的 3D 动画时，我不认为这是一个可能的原因，它的机制非常随意，与我个人的思想实验中的东西非常相似。
>>109597569
I had this happening for 15 years now
这种事我已经发生了 15 年了
sometimes I think of something like "I haven't seen that cat meme in a while" and then within a few days I come across it
有时我会想到“我有一段时间没看到那只猫模因了”之类的东西，然后几天之内我就遇到了它
what does this mean? am I influencing the fate with my thoughts?
这是什么意思？我是否用自己的思想影响了命运？
>>109599150
>>109599225
Again, I should have specified your replies are not to OP.
再次强调，我应该明确指出您的回复不是针对OP的。
heh. I am too funny and random to predict.
呵呵。我太有趣了，太随意了，无法预测。
>disable watch history
>禁用观看历史记录
>ublock recommendation divs
>ublock推荐div
（如果你觉得这篇文章有启发，可以点击这里付费）
