Trump scores major win as Supreme Court clears way for mail-in voting order ahead of 2026 midterms
特朗普大胜：最高法院在 2026 中期选举前为邮寄投票行政令放行
Fake news link, featuring statement from, notable retard and obvious activist shitlord, Ketanji:"Brown" Jackson
假新闻链接，里面有知名弱智、明显活动家狗屁领主 Ketanji「Brown」Jackson 的声明
https://apnews.com/article/trump-mail-voting-supreme-court-157afc3c195ce0a62c522da5ce904b04
And since AP is crap, if you chose to read it, here's what's going on:
既然 AP 很烂，你要是想读，这是现在的情况：
Real new:
真新闻：
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that President Trump’s executive order tightening the rules around mail-in voting can be implemented ahead of the November midterm elections.
最高法院周一裁定，特朗普总统收紧邮寄投票规则的行政令可以在 11 月中期选举前实施。
The 6-3 decision — with liberal Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor dissenting — marks a major victory for Trump, but appears to leave room for future legal challenges that could delay the president’s order.
6-3 的裁决——自由派大法官 Ketanji Brown Jackson、Elena Kagan 和 Sonia Sotomayor 异议——是特朗普的重大胜利，但似乎给未来的法律挑战留了余地，可能拖延总统的命令。
In its ruling, the high court overturned a lower court order that blocked the Trump administration from enforcing the March 31 mail-in voting order in response to a lawsuit filed by 23 Democratic-led states, who argued the directive unconstitutionally infringes on their authority to administer elections.
裁决中，最高法院推翻了下级法院的命令——该命令曾阻止特朗普政府执行 3 月 31 日的邮寄投票行政令，起因是 23 个民主党执政州起诉、称该指令违宪侵犯他们管理选举的权力。
The Supreme Court did not rule on whether Trump’s order was lawful, but determined it was too early for states to sue over it because harms must be “concrete” rather than “conjectural or hypothetical.”
最高法院没有裁决特朗普的命令是否合法，而是认定各州现在起诉为时过早，因为伤害必须「具体」而不是「猜测性或假设性的」。
The majority further noted that federal courts are barred from adjudicating disputes dependent on “contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all.”
多数意见进一步指出：联邦法院不得裁决取决于「可能不会如预期发生、甚至可能根本不会发生的偶然未来事件」的争议。
The injunction lifted by the high court had applied to the 23 states challenging the president’s order.
被最高法院解除的禁令适用于挑战总统命令的 23 个州。
Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James, who was part of the lawsuit, vowed that the “fight is far from over.”
参与诉讼的民主党纽约州总检察长 Letitia James 誓言「斗争远未结束」。
