>The agency’s attempt to intimidate David Streever is at the center of a First Amendment case.
>该机构试图恐吓大卫·斯特里弗是第一修正案案件的核心。
ICE 承认调查了基于受宪法保护的言论的批评者
>The agency’s attempt to intimidate David Streever is at the center of a First Amendment case.
>该机构试图恐吓大卫·斯特里弗是第一修正案案件的核心。
>Last June, two investigators employed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) showed up at David Streever's house in Rochester, New York. Streever was not home, so they left him a note.
>去年 6 月，国土安全部 (DHS) 雇用的两名调查员出现在大卫·斯特里弗 (David Streever) 位于纽约州罗彻斯特的家中。斯特里弗不在家，所以他们给他留了一张纸条。
>That note, presented as an official warning from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), is at the center of a First Amendment lawsuit that Streever filed last month, alleging that ICE agents investigated and threatened him based on his constitutionally protected criticism of their boss. This month, the government responded to Streever's lawsuit, confirming his allegations while attempting to rebut them.
>这张纸条作为移民和海关执法局 (ICE) 的正式警告提出，是斯特里弗上个月提起的第一修正案诉讼的核心，指控 ICE 特工基于他对老板的受宪法保护的批评而对他进行调查和威胁。本月，政府对斯特里弗的诉讼做出回应，证实了他的指控，同时试图反驳这些指控。
>On January 26, two days after DHS agents fatally shot Minneapolis protester Alex Pretti, Streever sent an angry email to Todd Lyons, then the acting ICE director. Streever called Lyons "a monstrous human being," likened him to the genocidal Nazi official Reinhard Heydrich, and predicted that he would be haunted by "shame at your own pathetic weakness" in defending the Pretti shooting "until your last day on Earth."
> 1 月 26 日，即国土安全部特工枪杀明尼阿波利斯抗议者亚历克斯·普雷蒂两天后，斯特里弗向时任 ICE 代理主任托德·莱昂斯发送了一封愤怒的电子邮件。斯特里弗称莱昂斯是“一个可怕的人”，将他比作种族灭绝的纳粹官员莱因哈德·海德里希，并预测他在为普雷蒂枪击案辩护时会“为自己可悲的弱点感到羞耻”，“直到你在地球上的最后一天”。
>Streever's evaluation of Lyons was harsh, to say the least. But he did not say anything that could reasonably be construed as a threat of violence.
>至少可以说，斯特里弗对里昂的评价是严厉的。但他没有说出任何可以合理解释为暴力威胁的话。
>Brent Goodwin, assistant director for investigations at ICE's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), nevertheless claims Streever's email "had potential threatening undertones" and "potentially present[ed] a safety concern." Because "ICE OPR did not have any information about Mr. Streever when the email came in," Goodwin says in an August 5 declaration, it "determined that it needed to conduct an ICE investigation."
> 不过，ICE 职业责任办公室 (OPR) 调查助理主任布伦特·古德温 (Brent Goodwin) 声称，斯特里弗的电子邮件“具有潜在的威胁意味”并且“可能存在安全问题”。古德温在 8 月 5 日的一份声明中表示，由于“收到电子邮件时，ICE OPR 没有关于斯特里弗先生的任何信息”，因此“决定需要进行 ICE 调查”。
>What happened next makes little sense if ICE's investigators, who did not even try to contact Streever until five months after his email, were attempting to resolve a legitimate "safety concern." But their actions are completely understandable if they were trying to intimidate an ICE critic.
>如果 ICE 的调查人员试图解决合法的“安全问题”，那么接下来发生的事情就毫无意义了，他们甚至在斯特里弗发出电子邮件后五个月后才尝试联系他。但如果他们试图恐吓 ICE 批评者，他们的行为是完全可以理解的。
>"YOU MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW," said the "WARNING NOTICE" that two agents left with Streever's wife in Rochester on June 23. It cited two statutes, one dealing with threats of violence against federal officials, the other making it a crime to reveal "restricted personal information" about them with the intent to intimidate or incite violence against them.
>“您可能违反了联邦法律”，两名特工于 6 月 23 日在罗切斯特与斯特里弗的妻子一起留下的“警告通知”中写道。它引用了两项法规，一项涉及对联邦官员进行暴力威胁，另一项将透露有关他们的“受限个人信息”并意图恐吓或煽动针对他们的暴力行为定为犯罪行为。
>Streever had not violated either of those laws. But the notice said ICE had "reason to believe" his email to Lyons "may constitute a violation of Title 18 of the United States Code," which includes more than 1,500 offenses.
>Streever 没有违反任何一条法律。但通知称，ICE 有“理由相信”他发给里昂的电子邮件“可能违反了《美国法典》第 18 条”，其中包括 1,500 多项违法行为。
>The document asked Streever to "promptly remove and/or discontinue the aforementioned behavior." It added that "receipt of this Notice will be taken into consideration, should you continue to be involved in any criminal activities described above."
>该文件要求 Streever“立即删除和/或停止上述行为。”它补充说，“如果您继续参与上述任何犯罪活动，我们将考虑收到本通知。”
>In addition to delivering the notice, DHS agents unsuccessfully tried to intercept Streever at John F. Kennedy International Airport when he returned from a trip to Finland with his 7-year-old daughter on June 25. They also repeatedly tried to contact him in person and by telephone at the New York hotel where he stayed that night.
>除了发出通知外，6 月 25 日，当斯特里弗带着 7 岁的女儿从芬兰旅行回来时，国土安全部特工还试图在约翰·F·肯尼迪国际机场拦截他，但没有成功。他们还多次尝试亲自或通过电话与他当晚入住的纽约酒店联系。
>After that, Goodwin says, ICE gave up, closing the case on June 30 because "all investigative leads" had been "exhausted." ICE did that even though its agents had never managed to interview Streever so they could determine "whether or not [he] presented a threat," which Goodwin describes as the object of the investigation.
>古德温说，此后，ICE 放弃了，并于 6 月 30 日结案，因为“所有调查线索”都已“用尽”。 ICE 这样做了，尽管其特工从未设法采访斯特里弗，以便他们能够确定“他是否构成威胁”，古德温将其描述为调查对象。
>Seeking dismissal of Streever's lawsuit, the government's lawyers concede his email to Lyons "put words to his disagreements with a current administration official." In other words, they admit he was investigated because of speech protected by the First Amendment.
>寻求驳回斯特里弗的诉讼，政府律师承认他给里昂的电子邮件“表达了他与现任政府官员的分歧”。换句话说，他们承认他因受第一修正案保护的言论而受到调查。
>Other ICE critics have received similar treatment. The Wall Street Journal reports that the agency "has deployed a round-the-clock digital dragnet" that tracks online speech to identify more targets.
>其他 ICE 批评者也受到了类似的待遇。 《华尔街日报》报道称，该机构“部署了全天候数字拉网”，跟踪在线言论以识别更多目标。
>ICE's retaliatory campaign, Streever's lawyers at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression warn, threatens the freedom to criticize police conduct without fear of arrest. Four decades ago, the Supreme Court described that ability as "one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state."
>斯特里弗在个人权利和表达基金会的律师警告说，ICE 的报复行动威胁到了批评警察行为而不用担心被捕的自由。四十年前，最高法院将这种能力描述为“我们区分自由国家和警察国家的主要特征之一”。
There are a lot of inline links to other articles and info about the lawsuit in the original reason webpage. I'm not going to copy paste them all here.
原始原因网页中有很多指向其他文章和有关诉讼的信息的内嵌链接。我不会将它们全部复制粘贴到这里。
Just open the link and read it yourself if you want to see them
如果您想查看它们，只需打开链接并自行阅读
>>1531051
>reason.com
Disregarded. Also, even if this were true, it was okay when Biden investigated parents at schools who were upset about the DEI and trans shit - As possible domestic terrorists! So what's the issue?
被忽略。而且，即使这是真的，当拜登调查学校里那些对 DEI 和变性狗屎感到不安的家长时，这也没关系——可能是国内恐怖分子！那么问题出在哪里呢？
>So what's the issue?
>那么问题出在哪里？
You're an esl shill
你是个ESL骗子
>>1531051
>Reason.com
>Not NY Post
>不是纽约邮政
Well, you tried,
好吧，你试过了，
Still thinking we have a functioning Constitution.
仍然认为我们有一部有效运作的宪法。
I swear, this is too cute for words.
我发誓，这太可爱了。
>>1531051
>>1531124
>threaten federal agents
>威胁联邦特工
>get a warning
>收到警告
>WAAAAAAAHHHHH THIS IS NAZI GERMANY
>>1531125
Where's the threat
威胁在哪里
>>1531142
Likewise.
>>1531112
The conservative Russia (redundant) still thinks he's human.
保守的俄罗斯（多余）仍然认为他是人。
>>1531051
Just because it’s Constitutionally Protected doesn’t mean we cannot look into it as a policing matter.
仅仅因为它受宪法保护并不意味着我们不能将其视为警务问题。
>>1531125
>threaten federal agents
>威胁联邦特工
Didn't happen. Read, nigger, read.
没有发生。读吧，黑鬼，读吧。
>>1531324
Likewise. ICE didn't threaten him.
同样。 ICE 没有威胁他。
>>1531331
I didn't say they did. Neither does the article.
我没说他们这么做了。文章也没有。
>send thinly veiled threat to federal agents
>向联邦特工发送几乎不加掩饰的威胁
>"wowww how was I supposed to know that would lead to me being investigated!"
>“哇哦，我怎么知道这会导致我被调查！”
Clown world honk honk
小丑世界喇叭喇叭
>>1531337
>>1531324
ESL Shill's Clown Fetish, Unveiled
ESL Shill 的小丑迷恋，揭晓
More at 10
更多内容请参见 10
（如果你觉得这篇文章有启发，可以点击这里付费）