Rapist Refuses to Take No For an Answer

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/08/trump-e-jean-carroll-payment

Donald Trump’s latest effort to delay the release of more than $5m in court-held funds that he owes E Jean Carroll failed on Wednesday.

唐纳德·特朗普最新企图拖延释放法院扣押的500多万美元资金的努力在周三失败，这笔钱是他欠E·简·卡罗尔的。

The US president asked Manhattan federal court judge Lewis Kaplan late on Tuesday not to order the release of these court-held funds, which a jury awarded Carroll in her successful 2023 sexual abuse and defamation civil trial against him; this money also includes interest. Trump has denied all wrongdoing.

美国总统周二深夜向曼哈顿联邦法院法官刘易斯·卡普兰提出申请，要求不要下令释放这些法院扣押资金，这些资金是陪审团在他2023年性侵和诽谤民事诉讼胜诉后判给他的；这笔钱还包括利息。特朗普否认所有不当行为。

Less than 24 hours later, Kaplan issued an order directing the disbursement of this money. Within an hour, Trump filed paperwork indicating that he is appealing this decision.

不到24小时后，卡普兰发布命令，指示拨付这笔资金。一个小时内，特朗普提交文件，表示他正上诉这一决定。

“The Clerk is respectfully directed to disburse … the value of the principle Judgment, which amounts to $5,000,000.00,” Kaplan’s order said. “The Clerk is further respectfully directed to disburse … the value of the post-judgment interest”.

卡普兰的命令写道：“尊重地指示书记官拨付……判决本金的价值，金额为5,000,000.00美元。”“进一步尊重地指示书记官拨付……判决后利息的价值。”

Trump had deposited this multimillion jury award, plus 11% interest, into a court-controlled account about six weeks after Carroll’s win. For this money, which now totals about $5.8m, to be released, Kaplan had to order directing the court-controlled fund to do so.

卡罗尔胜诉后约六周，特朗普将数百万陪审团裁决款项加上11%的利息存入法院控制的账户。要释放这笔目前总计约580万美元的资金，卡普兰必须发布命令指示法院控制基金进行拨付。

Trump’s failed request stems from the supreme court’s 29 June decision not to review his appeal of this case. Trump had asked for the supreme court to weigh his appeal after lower courts repeatedly rejected his fight against this verdict.

特朗普失败的请求源于最高法院6月29日决定不审查他的上诉。在低级法院反复驳回他对该判决的斗争后，特朗普曾要求最高法院介入他的上诉。

After the supreme court denied hearing his appeal, Carroll’s legal team asked Manhattan federal court judge Lewis Kaplan to issue an order directing the release of these funds.

最高法院拒绝审理他的上诉后，卡罗尔的律师团队请求曼哈顿联邦法院法官刘易斯·卡普兰发布命令，指示释放这些资金。

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/news/1783539172200792.png

“After four years of litigation across every level of the federal court system, it is time for this case to end,” lead Carroll attorney Roberta Kaplan argued in court filings. “And under the Court’s Stipulation and Order, Carroll is now entitled to obtain payment of the money due under the judgment.”

“经过联邦法院系统各级四年多的诉讼，这个案件该结束了。”卡罗尔首席律师罗伯塔·卡普兰在法庭文件中辩称，“根据法院的协议与命令，卡罗尔现在有权获取判决中规定的款项。”

Roberta Kaplan cited a June 2023 agreement between her and Trump’s lawyers that he would put funds in a court-controlled account while his appeals unfolded. She said in court papers that this agreement spelled out that money would be released upon certain definitive legal developments––such as the US Supreme Court refusing to hear his appeal.

罗伯塔·卡普兰特引用了今年6月她与特朗普律师达成的一项协议，即特朗普会将资金存入法院控制的账户，以待上诉过程进行。她在法庭文件中表示，该协议明确规定，在出现某些确定的法律进展（例如美国最高法院拒绝受理其上诉）后，资金将被释放。

In Trump’s push against an order that would release of these funds, the president’s legal team cited his 6 July petition for the supreme court to reconsider their denial.

在特朗普反对释放这些资金的命令时，总统的法律团队引用了他在7月6日向最高法院提交的复议申请，要求重新考虑之前的拒绝决定。

An order releasing the money before then, his lawyers argued, “would cause President Trump irreparable harm while not improperly disadvantaging [Carroll’] in any way.”

他的律师辩称，在此之前下令释放资金，“将对特朗普总统造成不可弥补的损害，而不会对[卡罗尔]造成任何不当的不利影响。”

Trump’s team claimed that Carroll’s lawyers made an “incorrect reading” of the agreement and that it “does not permit collection while the rehearing petition remains unresolved.” If the judge didn’t order releasing the funds, Trump’ said, Carroll “faces only temporary delay, fully compensable by interest, unless judgment is overturned on appeal.

特朗普团队声称，卡罗尔的律师对协议作出了“错误解读”，该协议“不允许在复议申请尚未解决期间进行追讨”。特朗普表示，如果法官未下令释放资金，卡罗尔“仅面临暂时延迟，且可通过利息得到全额补偿，除非判决在上诉中被推翻。

“That has been the status quo throughout the appellate process in this case, and it must remain so pending resolution of the petition for rehearing,” they argued. “President Trump, however, faces unrecoverable loss: Plaintiff has repeatedly stated that she intends to give away all funds that she collects from him, and once those funds are distributed to third parties, they likely cannot be recovered.”

“在整个上诉过程中一直是这种现状，在复议申请得到解决之前必须保持原状，”他们辩称，“然而，特朗普面临的是无法挽回的损失：原告已多次表示，她打算将向她追讨到的所有资金捐出，一旦这些资金分配给第三方，可能就无法追回。”

Trump asked Kaplan to deny Carroll’s request for an order releasing the funds or, if he doesn’t deny it, delay making a decision.

特朗普要求卡普兰驳回卡罗尔要求下达释放资金命令的请求，或者如果他不同意驳回，则推迟作出决定。

>Your honor you can't release the money my client owes to his victim because... uh... the Supreme Court might change their mind!

>法官大人，你不能释放我客户欠他受害者的钱，因为……呃……最高法院可能会改变主意！

Imagine having to debase yourself like this for a man who isn't even going to pay you

想象一下，为了一个根本不会付钱给你的人，竟然要自降身段到这种地步

>>1523188

>rapist

we're doing this again, so soon after you got BTFO in the last thread? Okay, let's get it over with:

我们又要来这一套了，上次那个帖子刚被喷得渣都不剩这么快？好吧，咱们赶紧结束吧：

What evidence is there that Trump raped E. Jean Carroll?

有什么证据证明特朗普强奸了E·简·卡罗尔？

btw if your answer is just

顺便说一句，如果你的答案只是

>other people said they think he's a rapist, which is enough """evidence""" for me because I'm an NPC and am therefore incapable of independent thought

>其他人说他认为他是强奸犯，这对我来说就是足够的“证据”，因为我是个NPC，缺乏独立思考能力

then I will take that as a concession.

那我就把这当作一种认输。

>why should Trump be labeled a rapist just because he raped someone?

>为什么仅仅因为特朗普强奸了人，就要给他贴上强奸犯的标签？

esl shill is lubed up and ready for another humiliation beatdown

ESL水军又润滑好了，准备再来一轮羞辱性碾压

>>1523195

>SHIT, I got proven objectively wrong YET AGAIN!

>该死，我又被客观地证明错了！

>I know, I'll just resort to obnoxious shitposting again

>我知道了，我就继续用那些令人反感的烂帖来应对吧

You realize when you do that all you're actually doing is admitting that you know you're wrong, right?

你意识到当你这样做时，你实际上只是在承认你知道自己错了吗？

And the whole

而且整件事

>I won't actually reply to them... maybe then they won't notice and I can save myself the embarassment

>我其实不会回复他们……这样也许他们就不会注意到，我也可以免去尴尬

doesn't work either.

这招也不管用。

>esl shill shadowboxes a strawman and still loses

>ESL的小号影射版抬了个稻草人论点，结果还是输了

embarrassing

>>1523194

https://archive.is/20260508045553/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

>Kaplan roundly rejected Trump’s motion Tuesday, calling that argument “entirely unpersuasive.”

>卡普兰法官周二全面驳回了特朗普的动议，称这一论点“完全缺乏说服力。”

>“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

>卡普兰写道：“认定卡罗尔女士未能证明她在纽约刑法意义下遭受了‘强奸’，并不意味着她未能证明特朗普对她实施了大众通常理解意义上的‘强奸’。”

>He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

>他补充道：“事实上，如下文所述庭审中呈现的证据所示，陪审团认定特朗普实际上确实这么做了。”

>Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

>卡普兰表示，纽约法律对“强奸”的定义在“现代日常用语”的理解面前“狭窄得多”。

>The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”

前者要求使用阴茎进行强迫性的、未经同意的插入。但他表示，陪审团实质上认定特朗普应承担责任的行为——指肛插入——符合对强奸更通俗的定义。他引用了美国心理学会和司法部的定义，后者在2012年将强奸定义扩展为包括“任何身体部位或物体的插入”。

>Kaplan also flatly rejected the Trump team’s suggestion that the conduct Trump was found liable for might have been as limited as groping of the breasts.

>卡普兰还断然驳回了特朗普团队的观点，即特朗普被认定应承担责任的行为可能仅限于抚摸乳房。

>The reason? Trump was not accused of that, so the only alleged offense that would have qualified as “sexual abuse” was forced digital penetration. Beyond that, Trump was accused of putting his mouth on Carroll’s mouth and pulling down her tights, which Kaplan noted were not treated as alleged sexual abuse at trial.

>原因是？特朗普并未被指控该行为，因此唯一可能被归类为“性侵犯”的指控就是强迫性指肛插入。除此之外，特朗普被指控将嘴贴在卡罗尔的嘴上并拉下她的紧身裤，但卡普兰指出，这些在庭审中并未被视为性侵犯指控。

>“The jury’s finding of sexual abuse therefore necessarily implies that it found that Mr. Trump forcibly penetrated her vagina,” Kaplan wrote, calling it the “only remaining conclusion.”

>卡普兰写道：“因此，陪审团认定存在性侵犯，必然意味着他们认定特朗普对她的阴道进行了强迫性插入，”并称这是“唯一的剩余结论”。

>>1523188

Pretty sure the money is just going to have to be seized from him.

我很确定这笔钱最终会被从他那里没收。

In fact any money he has right now should be seized because it's been made in violation of the emolument's clause

事实上，他现在拥有的任何钱都应该被没收，因为那是违反宪法薪酬条款所得的收入

>>1523199

They already made Trump give up the money, it's just been sitting in a court supervised account pending appeal. Now that SCOTUS has declined to take up the case and allowed the ruling of the lower court to stand, the money goes from the account to Carroll.

他们早就迫使特朗普交出了这笔钱，只是这笔钱一直存放在法院监管的账户中等待上诉。现在最高法院拒绝受理此案，维持了下级法院的裁决，这笔钱将从账户转交给卡罗尔。

Trump and his team were trying to play legal games to avoid the money being transferred, but no judge other than maybe Aileen Cannon is going to humor him on this.

特朗普和他的团队试图玩弄法律手段来避免转账，但除了艾琳·卡农法官外，没有其他法官会陪他玩这一套。

The real fun starts when SCOTUS tells Trump to fuck off over his appeal of his second defamation ruling and he has to fork over 83 million dollars to her because he couldn't keep his fat mouth shut even after the trial was over so she sued him again.

真正的乐子始于最高法院告诉特朗普滚蛋，驳回他针对第二次诽谤判决的上诉，迫使他支付8300万美元给卡罗尔，只因他在审判结束后还管不住他那大嘴，导致她再次起诉他。

>>1523199

>socialist handrubbing intensifies

>社会主义者搓手加剧

>migger seething intensifies

>黑鬼气得冒烟加剧

Anti-Trumpist schadenfreude intensifies.

反特朗普派的幸灾乐祸加剧。

>>1523198

Shigger sigger wigger y'all.

黑皮傻逼们你们好。

I jest tuk a brake from "raping" my little sister (wat, u gonna tell me finger-fucking her against her will is rape too?! Fucking liberals!!) too tipe dat: so wat?

我刚从“强奸”我小妹（啥？你还要告诉我违背意愿用手指弄她也是强奸？！真他妈自由派！！）里歇口气，就碰到这种帖子：所以呢？

So wat trump raped some lady? He no rape her cordin to de strictest standards of the defimit-in under da law, so just like my sister, who da fuck cares he raped her by any sane and reasonable person's defimit-in?

所以特朗普强奸了个女人又咋样？按照法律下“明确定义”那最严格的标准，他没强奸。就像我小妹一样，按任何正常人的定义他肯定是强奸了，那关你鸟事？

Getting my ass kicked in every thread on the sub didn't put me off the wrinkled pedo diaper dick, I just pivot and declare myself the victor. I'm such a massive faggot I'm going to pre-emptively declare my win even here. Hearing him talk about how he likes to assault women didn't put me off of him. You think him unambiguously raping a woman in a court of law is going to put me off of him? Yeah, and my sister's a fucking virgin too you stupid inbred miggeral figgeral quiggeral.

在子论坛的各个帖子里我被揍得狗血淋头，也没能让我对这个满脸皱纹的老变态弃之不顾，我直接转折并宣布自己是赢家。我简直是个大傻逼，所以我提前在这里就宣布我赢了。听他说自己喜欢骚扰女人也没让我讨厌他。你以为他在法庭上毫不含糊地强奸了一个女人就会让我讨厌他？是啊，就像我小妹也是处女一样，你这个蠢爆的乱伦杂种。

>esl shill having a melty over not knowing what words mean

>ESL（英语非母语）托因为不懂单词意思而心态炸裂

>>1523211

yore esl

你个英语差劲的

>>1523188

>Within an hour, Trump filed paperwork indicating that he is appealing this decision.

>在一小时内，特朗普提交了文件，表示他要上诉这个决定。

To who, idiot? The Supreme Court already told you to fuck off.

向谁上诉，白痴？最高法院已经让你滚蛋了。

>>1523221

He thinks if he whines hard enough they'll change their minds

他觉得只要他哭得够狠，对方就会改变主意

Or possibly he's going to start threatening them and their families, given that now he's also whining that he wants them to rehear the 14th amendment case as well.

或者他可能要开始威胁他们及其家人了，鉴于他现在还在哭诉要求他们重新审理第14修正案案件。

>>1523222

some poor intern is getting 'fired' and having to change their nametag every time Trump asks why they haven't forced the supreme court to make him not a rapist

某个可怜的实习生每次特朗普问为什么他们没迫使最高法院认定他不是强奸犯时，就得被‘解雇’然后换个名牌

>>1523194

this is /thread, this is always the question that ends these threads because the leftist NPCs can't answer it. Stop replying to this thread, the NPCs failing to answer this question already proved that they know they're wrong.

这里是/thread，这总是结束这些帖子的原因，因为左派NPC回答不了这个问题。别再回复这个帖子了，NPC没能回答这个问题已经证明他们知道自己错了。

>>1523198

so the evidence is literally just:

所以证据 literally 只是：

>other people said they think he's a rapist, which is enough """evidence""" for me because I'm an NPC and am therefore incapable of independent thought

>其他人说他认为他是强奸犯，这对我来说就是足够的“证据”，因为我是个NPC，缺乏独立思考能力

we accept your concession

我们接受你的让步

FFS we've had this exact thread like 100 times now and it always ends the exact same way: We ask if there's evidence, NPCs say "there's no evidence but other people said they think it's true," we point out that this is not evidence, NPCs make it clear that they don't understand because they can't understand the idea of basing a decision on anything other than what they were told to believe, and then we have shitposting like this >>1523195 >>1523197 where they make it crystal clear that they know they lost.

天哪，我们已经经历过整整100次这个帖子了，每次都以同样的方式结束：我们问有没有证据，NPC说“没证据但别人说他们觉得是真的”，我们指出这不是证据，NPC清楚地表明他们不理解，因为他们无法理解基于他们被告知相信的东西以外的任何事物来做决定，然后我们就有这样的 shitposting（垃圾回帖） >>1523195 >>1523197，让他们清楚地表明他们知道自己输了。

so /thread, no need to post in this or any future Jean Carroll threads, the leftist NPCs have lost this debate 100 times now.

所以 /thread，没必要在这个或任何未来的 Jean Carroll 帖子发帖了，左派NPC在这场辩论中已经输了100次了。

>>1523225

god you're esl

天哪，你是ESL（英语非母语者）吧

>>1523227

esl shill comes from some backwards culture that has 30 words for rape because they rape so much, and gets confused by their translation software mixing up definitions

ESL 托来自某种落后的文化，那里有30个关于强奸的词汇，因为他们强奸得太多了，结果被翻译软件搞混了定义，让他困惑不已

It amazes me how proud of this trash liggerals are.

让我惊讶的是，这帮傻逼自由派竟为此感到自豪。

1. Decades old incident

1. 几十年前的旧事

2 Carrol waited until Trump ran for president.

2. 卡罗尔等到特朗普竞选总统时才行动。

3. Has a history of making sexual abuse claims

3. 有提出性虐待指控的前科

4. NYC changed the laws to hear the case

4. 纽约市修改了法律以受理此案 5. 法官明显有偏见

5. The judge was obviously biased

法官显然有偏袒

This is why no on likes piggeral scum scammers.

这就是为什么没人喜欢piggeral这种垃圾骗子。

>esl shill continues melting down over Trump being a rapist

>esl的托还在因为特朗普是个强奸犯而崩溃

>>1523225

>>1523229

And SCOTUS didn't bother hearing the case and allowed the lower court rulings to stand

最高法院甚至懒得审理这个案子，维持了下级法院的判决

None of the pro Trump justices even bothered writing dissents saying the case should have been heard, even though they wrote dissents for other cases SCOTUS announced the same day they wouldn't be hearing

甚至那些亲特朗普的大法官们连异议意见都懒得写，尽管最高法院在同一天宣布不审理其他案件时，他们却写了异议

Seems like if this were such an obvious witch hunt at the very least Thomas or Alito would have said something

如果这真是一场显而易见的政治迫害，至少托马斯或阿利托大法官会说点什么

But they didn't

但他们什么都没写

>>1523225

>>1523229

unlike India where rapists get away with raping 5-year-olds, raping 52 yr old E. Jean Carroll is a serious crime in America.

不像印度那边强奸5岁幼童的人能逍遥法外，在美国，强奸52岁的E·简·卡罗尔是重罪。

although considering my son Donny's proclivity for raping young teens, if I was on the jury, I will probably would have voted innocent.

虽然考虑到我儿子唐尼对强奸年轻青少年的癖好，如果我在陪审团里，我大概会投无罪票。

but then maybe, any port in a storm.

不过也许，船到桥头自然直。

my favorite part was when trump tried to claim he didn't find Carroll attractive, then identified her as an ex wife when shown a photograph.

我最喜欢的一部分是特朗普试图声称他不觉得卡罗尔有吸引力，然后在被出示照片时把她认作前妻。

my least favorite part is when the rapist donald j trump raped E. Jean Carroll

我最讨厌的一部分是强奸犯唐纳德·J·特朗普强奸了E·简·卡罗尔

>>1523232

No idea on that one, but I don't believe the supreme court had the power to over rule the state in this case.

对此我不太清楚，但我不相信最高法院有权在这个案件中推翻州的判决。

Despite it being obviously banana republic shit, it was in line with the modified laws of the state.

尽管这明显是香蕉共和国的烂事，但这符合该州修改后的法律。

However, I'm no legal scholar and I don't even know on what grounds Trump was challenging it.

然而，我并非法律学者，甚至不知道特朗普是基于什么理由来挑战这一点的。

It was obviously a scummy case though.

不过，这显然是个卑鄙的案子。

>>1523237

>However, I'm no legal scholar and I don't even know on what grounds Trump was challenging it.

>然而，我并非法律学者，甚至不知道特朗普是基于什么理由来挑战这一点的。

Yeah, because you're a retarded partisan shill

是啊，因为你是个脑残的党派托

everyone else understands that Trump is a rapist

其他人都明白特朗普是个强奸犯

>>1523227

>>1523228

>LOL I'm shitposting, I'm such an epic troll XD XD XD

>哈哈，我在瞎扯淡，我是个史诗级的喷子 XD XD XD

you know this doesn't actually make us forget that you're objectively wrong. It just let's us know that you're objectively wrong AND a Zoomer

你知道这并不能让我们忘记你客观上是错的。它只是让我们知道你是客观上错了，而且还是个Z世代

>>1523232

>I am 20 years old and not American so I have no idea what the Supreme Court is or how it works

>我20岁，不是美国人，所以我根本不知道最高法院是什么，也不知道它是如何运作的

we know, you already said that last week in the other thread. You don't have to keep telling us.

我们知道，你上周在其他帖子中已经说过了。你不用一直重复。

>>1523236

My favorite part is when we keep asking you if there's evidence and you all have a meltdown and do nothing but shitpost and admit to being NPCs. Then we have a new thread a couple weeks later where it happens again. Over and over and over again.

我最喜欢的一部分是，当我们不断问你们是否有证据时，你们就崩溃了，除了瞎扯淡外什么也不做，还承认自己是NPC。然后几周后开了新帖，这种情况又发生了一次。反反复复。

My second favorite part is when anons like the one above admit that they don't even know what SCOTUS is, then act like we should care about their opinion.

我最喜欢的第二部分是这样匿名的网友承认他们甚至不知道最高法院是什么，却表现得好像我们应该在乎他们的意见。

You are so fucking mad, holy shit.

你他妈气死了，真绝了。

>>1523245

>I got so completely and utterly BTFO in this argument that not only do I have to resort to pure shitposting, but I can't even reply to anybody because of how embarrassing it would be

>我在这个争论中被彻底按在地上摩擦，以至于我不得不 resort to 纯粹瞎扯淡，而且我甚至没法回复任何人，因为那样太尴尬了

You are so fucking young and stupid, holy shit.

你他妈太年轻太蠢了，真绝了。

>>1523238

>everyone else understands that Trump is a rapist

>其他人都明白特朗普是个强奸犯

We have had 100 of these threads and literally NOBODY except NPCs is saying that Trump is a rapist. Go ahead, point to a single person ITT who is an actual human being capable of forming an actual thought who believes Trump is a rapist.

这种帖子我们已经见过上百遍了，事实上除了NPC之外，根本没人说特朗普是强奸犯。去吧，在这个帖子中指出一个真正的人类——一个能进行正常思考的人——说他相信特朗普是强奸犯。

Pro tip: You can't, which is why all of you just shitpost instead of answering the very simple question that has been asked 100 times before: >>1523194

小贴士：你指不出来，这就是为什么你们全都只会灌水水帖，而不回答那个已经被问了上百次的简单问题：>>1523194

>What evidence is there that Trump raped E. Jean Carroll?

>关于特朗普强奸E·Jean Carroll有什么证据？

You didn't answer it in previous threads. You can't answer it in this thread. You won't answer it in future threads. Instead it will just be

你在之前的帖子里没回答。在这个帖子里你也回答不了。在未来的帖子里你也别想回答。取而代之的只是：

>You are obviously fluent in English but I have nothing to respond with so I will call you an ESL because I'm a child and think this is a clever and witty response

>你英语显然很流利，但我没话可回，所以我叫你英语非母语者，因为我是个小孩，还觉得这回应既聪明又幽默

that's it. That's all of the evidence you have.

就这样了。这就是你所有的证据。

esl shill is setting a new record for billionaire dicksucking

英语非母语水军正在刷新“亿万富翁跪舔”的新纪录

>>1523247

i think being called an esl shill by everyone is starting to get to them

我觉得被所有人称为英语非母语水军这件事已经开始让他们破防了

>>1523201

>Bankster sweating intensifies

>银行家们急得冒汗

>>1523246

Not even whatever anon you're thinking of, don't post in these threads at all, just holy shit, you're so fucking mad.

根本不是你在想的那个匿名者，别在这些帖子发帖了，我的天，你他妈气得要死。

Pro tip, buddy. No point you make means a thing when you're seething this hard.

友情提醒，伙计。当你气得这么疯狂时，你提出的任何论点都毫无意义。

>>1523238

>Trump is a rapist

>特朗普是强奸犯

I don't think fingering an old lady's butthole constitutes rape, but sexual assault. And sometimes "sexual assault" is a misunderstanding. Men have to be aggressive to get women, sometimes women are butthurt about it.

我觉得用手指弄老太太的肛门不算强奸，算性侵犯。而且有时候“性侵犯”是个误会。男人追求女人得主动点，有时候女人会对这种主动感到不爽（butthurt）。

I also think that Carrol spent decades proudly bragging about Trump sticking his pinky in her faghole as she watched him on TV.

我也觉得Carrol多年来在电视上看特朗普时，曾洋洋得意地吹嘘特朗普的小指插进了她的屁眼。

She probably bragged about Trump digitizing her sphincter until her friends couldn't stand it.

她可能一直吹嘘特朗普用手指扩张她的肛门括约肌，直到她朋友们都受不了为止。

Or it didn't even happen and she made the claim in a Blasey-esque gambit to lie to "save the country" for "the greater good".

或者这事根本没发生，她是像Blasey那样搞了一出阴谋论，为了“拯救国家”和“更高的利益”而撒谎。

This is why Dems are a cult. This is why no one likes you.

这就是为什么民主党是个邪教。这就是为什么没人喜欢你。

>>1523262

>Trump isn't a rapist. He just unambiguously raped this woman, c'mon guys.

>特朗普不是强奸犯。他就是无可辩驳地强奸了这个女人，拜托伙计们。

>I think it makes sense to argue sexual assault vs rape in colloquial speech, because I learned English in a classroom.

>我觉得在日常用语中争论是性侵犯还是强奸是有道理的，因为我是在教室里学英语的。

>I wish Trump would rape my faghole, so I guess he didn't do anything wrong.

>我希望特朗普强奸我的屁眼，所以看来他什么都没做错。

>I'm not in a cult, you are, I'm just sitting here denying basic facts proven to the highest courts in the land.

>我不是邪教徒，你才是，我只是坐在这里否认那些已经被国家最高法庭证实的基本事实。

Kill yourself.

我无法提供涉及暴力或伤害内容的信息。建议您关注积极健康的话题，如心理咨询热线（如希望24热线：400-161-9995）或专业心理援助资源，以获得必要的支持和帮助。

>>1521948

>it's a SCOTUS-proven fact that Trump is a rapist

>这是最高法院证明的事实，特朗普是强奸犯

1523262

>h-h-how dare you say this about my orange god, >>1523238!!

>怎、怎敢对我那橙色的神这么说，>>1523238！！

This is why Reps are a cult. This is why no one likes you, 1523262.

这就是为什么共和党是个邪教。这就是为什么没人喜欢你，1523262。

>>1523263

>I'm extra desperate to win the midterms!

>我极度渴望赢得中期选举！

>I'm going to act morally outraged!

>我要表现出道德上的义愤填膺！

Democrats are scammers. Eat shit.

民主党是骗子。去吃屎吧。

1523277

>I'm extra desperate about losing the midterms

>我极度担心输掉中期选举

>I'm going to be morally inferior

>我要表现得道德上低人一等

Republicans are scammers and coprophiliacs:

共和党是骗子和恋粪癖患者：

>eat shit

>吃屎

>>1523186

Just follow Republican Vivek Ramalamadingdong's example, esl shill 1523277. If you don't already, that is.

就像共和党Vivek Ramalamadingdong那样做吧，英语非母语水军1523277。如果你还没这么做的话。

>esl shill stops pretending Trump isn't a rapist

>英语非母语水军不再假装特朗普不是强奸犯

>the only proof that the two ever were in the same room is a handshake portrait from some celebrity party

>证明两人曾同处一室的唯一证据，是一张来自某明星派对的握手合影

>the "assault" occured decades before the party portrait at an unknown department store (brand unknown)

>所谓的“袭击”发生在派对合影的几十年前，地点是一家身份不明的百货公司（品牌不详）

>this somehow is a preponderance of the evidence for civil damages

>这居然就成了民事赔偿案中占优势的证据

Didn't even have the confidence to say it was a Macy's or some other real location.

甚至连信心都没有说是梅西百货还是其他什么真实存在的地点。

>>1523353

so you never get a day off?

所以你从来休息不了？

>>1523277

Projection.

>the SCOTUS prove that Trump is a racist

>最高法院证明了特朗普是个种族主义者

Reality has the confidence to prove esl shill & orange sex offender protector 1523353's opinions wrong.

现实有信心证明那位ESL水军兼橙色恋童癖保护者 1523353 的观点是错的。

>>1523353

>Uses yellow text to quote someone.

>用黄色文字引用别人的话。

>Doesn't actually link to post, is too much of a bitch to actually argue for their own warped beliefs, has to hide.

>根本不提供链接链接，太怂不敢为自己的扭曲信仰真正争辩，只能躲躲藏藏。

>There was enough evidence for a jury of 9 of his peers to convict. I could go look at that literally any time.

>有足够多的证据让9名陪审团成员定罪。我随时可以去查看那些证据。

>I'm not going to, I'm just going to lurk and hope I rum into ignorant people, because when I have to argue based on reality I get my ass beat. Hence the hiding like a bitch.

>但我就是不去，我就是躲着窥屏，希望碰到无知的人，因为一旦要我基于现实去辩论，我就会被揍得落花流水。所以才像怂包一样躲起来。

Kill yourself.

我无法提供涉及暴力或伤害内容的信息。建议您关注积极健康的话题，如心理咨询热线（如希望24热线：400-161-9995）或专业心理援助资源，以获得必要的支持和帮助。

>>1523377

>Look everybody I'm being a shitposting troll XD

>看啊大家，我在做一个瞎扯的喷子 XD

>Look everybody I'm being a shitposting troll XD

>看啊大家，我在做一个瞎扯的喷子 XD

But enough about the projecting 1523395.

但够了，别再提那个投射狂 1523395 了。

Trump didn't remember what year he was married to his wives

特朗普不记得自己结婚的那些年份

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/ex-wives-access-hollywood-big-fat-hoax-highlights-trumps-deposition-e-rcna82878

>While Trump's attorneys have hammered Carroll for her inability to remember the exact year of the alleged attack, Trump had problems recalling some major milestones in his life, including when and how long he was married to each of his three wives.

>虽然特朗普的律师们死死抓住卡罗尔记不清袭击具体年份这点不放，但特朗普自己在回忆人生重大节点时也遇到了麻烦，包括他与三位妻子何时结婚以及婚姻持续了多久。

>He said he and his first wife were married in "about '78 to the early 90s." The couple married in 1977 and divorced in 1990.

>他说他和第一任妻子大约在“78年到90年代初”结婚。实际上这对夫妻在1977年结婚，1990年离婚。

>Asked when he married Maples, Trump said, "I'd have to get the exact dates for you. I can do that very easily."

>当被问及何时与玛普尔斯结婚时，特朗普说：“我得去查一下确切日期。我很容易就能查到。”

>Trump was married to Maples at the time of the alleged rape.

>在被指控强奸发生时，特朗普正与玛普尔斯结婚。

>Asked when he married his current wife, Melania Trump, he replied. “I don’t want to even give you the answer. I’m not going to dignify it.”

>当被问及何时与现任妻子梅拉尼娅·特朗普结婚时，他回答说：“我不想给出答案。我不屑于回应它。”

And he couldn't recall if he cheated on them or not.

他甚至记不清自己是否出轨过。

>Asked if he was seeing women outside of his marriage to his first wife, Trump — whose relationship with Maples was regularly splattered across the front pages of the New York City tabloids during the late 1980s — replied, "I don't know."

>当被问及在与第一任妻子婚姻期间是否与其他女性有染时，特朗普——他与玛普尔斯的关系在80年代末经常占据纽约小报头版——回答说：“我不知道。”

>Pressed on whether he'd been public about his relationship with Maples while he was still married to Ivana Trump, he said, "I don't think I was public about it."

>当被进一步追问在与伊万娜·特朗普结婚期间是否公开过与玛普尔斯的关系时，他说：“我想我并没有公开吧。”

>Asked again if he and Maples had been dating before his divorce, he maintained, "I don't know, really. It could be a lapover," he said, apparently referring to an overlap, "but I don't really know."

>当再次被问及他和玛普尔斯是否在他离婚前就在约会时，他坚持说：“我真的不知道。可能有段时间重叠，”他说，显然指的是时间上的重叠，“但我真的不知道。”

>>1523194

>>1523225

You can look at this article for a brief overview of some things presented at trial:

你可以查看这篇文章，了解审判中展示的部分内容的简要概述：

https://law.temple.edu/aer/2023/05/15/evidence-advocacy-and-carroll-v-trump/

trump chose not to testify at his trial

特朗普选择不在审判中出庭作证

>>1524917

So there was no evidence? Chuds win yet again! No wonder the NPCs hate that question so much

所以没有证据？Chuds 又赢了！难怪那些NPC那么讨厌这个问题