2026年7月30日 · 星期四
● 每日更新·改变自己
Eurekar·TOP
捕捉真实世界的英语信号
25信息来源
8,198精选文章
167单词卡片
18照片图片
全部6,459口语2,048免费395新闻1,599帖子1,379hackernews649techmeme455tmz451随笔323slashdot309外刊291arstechnica230techcrunch218Cards167simonwillison72动态69bloomberg54sethgodin43图片18youtube7

SCOTUS Confirms Donald Trump is a Rapist

最高法院确认唐纳德·特朗普是强奸犯

4chan /news/ · Anonymous · 2026-06-29 16:35 · 86 帖 · 原文 ↗

← 上一篇返回列表下一篇 →
#1 SCOTUS Confirms Donald Trump is a Rapist / 最高法院确认唐纳德·特朗普是强奸犯
Anonymous · 2026-06-29 16:35

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-trump-effort-overturn-e-jean-carroll-sexual-assa-rcna256546

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday handed a loss to President Donald Trump by refusing to hear his attempt to overturn a jury's finding that he sexually abused and later defamed writer E. Jean Carroll.

华盛顿 —— 最高法院周一驳回了唐纳德·特朗普总统试图推翻陪审团认定他性虐待并随后诽谤作家E·Jean·卡罗尔的尝试,这对特朗普来说是个败诉。

The justices turned away Trump's appeal in the case, meaning that the 2023 jury verdict and a $5 million civil judgment remain in place.

最高法院驳回了特朗普在该案中的上诉,这意味着2023年的陪审团裁决以及500万美元的民事判决继续有效。

The case arose from a federal lawsuit filed by Carroll in Manhattan alleging that Trump assaulted her in the dressing room of a department store in 1996. The defamation claims relate to statements he made about her after his first term in office, in which he described her claims as a "con job" and "hoax."

该案源于卡罗尔在曼哈顿提起的一项联邦诉讼,指控特朗普于1996年在一家百货公司的更衣室对她施暴。诽谤诉讼涉及他卸任第一任总统后对她发表的言论,他曾称她的指控是“骗局”和“恶作剧”。

Trump blasted the high court’s ruling in a post on social media and vowed to keep fighting the case “with all of my power and strength,” despite the judges seeming to shut the door on the verdict.

尽管法官们似乎已经关闭了推翻裁决的大门,但特朗普仍在社交媒体上发帖猛烈抨击最高法院的裁决,并誓言将“倾尽全力”继续与此案抗争。

The president referred to Carroll as a “woman I never met (Decades old celebrity photo line, standing with her husband, does not count!),” he wrote Monday, referring to a picture that emerged of him and Carroll after he first said he’d never met her. Trump’s insistence he’d never met her was a part of her defamation case, and a jury sided with Carroll.

他周一写道,他称卡罗尔为“我从未见过的女人(几十年前的名人合影,和她丈夫站在一起,不算!)”,指的是一张他在声称从未见过她之后,两人同框的照片浮出水面的情况。他坚称从未见过她,这是她诽谤案的一部分,而陪审团站在了卡罗尔一边。

“This Case is really against the United States of America, and all it stands for, and should never be allowed to happen to another President, or Candidate to be!,” he said. He added, “this Injustice cannot be allowed to stand!”

他说:“这个案件实际上是针对美利坚合众国及其所代表的一切的,绝不应该让任何一位总统或总统候选人遭遇如此!”他补充道:“绝不能让这种不公正的事情继续存在!”

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/news/1782750908564585.png

#2 No.1521949
Anonymous · 2026-06-29 16:36

A spokesman for Trump’s legal team said of the high court’s move, “The American People stand with President Trump as they demand an immediate end to all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded travesty of the Carroll Hoaxes.”

特朗普法律顾问团队的一位发言人就最高法院的这一举动表示:“美国民众与特朗普总统站在一起,他们要求立即停止所有‘猎巫行动’,包括民主党资助的卡罗尔骗局这一丑剧。”

Carroll first made her allegations in 2019, and sued Trump, who was serving his first term, for defamation later that year after he called her a liar who’d made up the claim to get rich.

卡罗尔最初在2019年提出指控,同年晚些时候对正在担任第一任总统的特朗普提起诽谤诉讼,因为特朗普称她是个骗子,编造该指控是为了发财。

While that case was tied up in court over legal questions about presidential immunity for his comments, she filed a second suit in 2022, in part under a New York state law aimed at assisting survivors of sexual assault from years ago.

在那起案件因涉及总统言论豁免权的法律问题而在法院缠斗之际,她于2022年提起了第二起诉讼,部分依据是旨在协助多年前来寻求正义的性侵犯受害者的纽约州法律。

The second suit, which included post-presidency defamation claims against Trump, was the first to go to trial and was the case the high court declined to hear Monday.

第二起诉讼包括对特朗普卸任后的诽谤指控,这是第一起进入庭审的案件,也是最高法院周一拒绝审理的案件。

Trump has denied Carroll’s allegations, with his lawyers noting that Carroll never reported the incident to the police and that there were no witnesses. Trump's legal team said in a court filing that Carroll waited until he was president to bring her claims so she could "maximize political injury to him and profit for herself."

特朗普否认了卡罗尔的指控,他的律师指出,卡罗尔从未向警方报案,也没有目击证人。特朗普的法律团队在一份法庭文件中表示,卡罗尔一直等到他成为总统时才提出指控,目的是“最大化对他的政治伤害并为她自己谋利”。

On appeal, Trump had argued that Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan should not have allowed testimony from other women, Jessica Leeds and Natasha Stoynoff, who had accused Trump of sexual misconduct. Trump also denied those allegations.

在上诉中,特朗普辩称,曼哈顿联邦地区法院的刘易斯·卡普兰法官不应允许其他女性杰西卡·利德斯和娜塔莎·斯托约诺夫出庭作证,她们指控特朗普有不当性行为。特朗普也否认了这些指控。

Trump's lawyers also said Kaplan should not have allowed jurors to view the infamous "Access Hollywood" tape in which Trump could be heard speaking disparagingly about women.

特朗普的律师还表示,卡普兰法官不应允许陪审员观看那段臭名昭著的“好莱坞通道”录音带,其中可以听到特朗普贬低女性的言论。

Trump’s lawyers argued that, taken together, Kaplan's decisions to allow the evidence not directly tied to Carroll's claims helped boost her case and cover up for the lack of direct evidence relating to her specific allegations.

特朗普的律师辩称,卡普兰允许那些与卡罗尔主张无直接关联的证据得以采纳,综合起来帮助提升了她的案子,并掩盖了缺乏与其具体指控直接相关证据的事实。

#3 No.1521950
Anonymous · 2026-06-29 16:37

Carroll's lawyers noted that she told two friends about the alleged attack shortly after it happened, and both testified at the trial. The attorneys said in court papers that Kaplan correctly allowed the evidence to be admitted as it speaks to Trump's alleged prior conduct and his propensity to take the kind of actions she claimed in her lawsuit.

卡罗尔的律师指出,她在 alleged 袭击发生不久后就向两位朋友提及此事,且两人在庭审中都作证了。律师在法庭文件中表示,卡普兰准许该证据被采纳是正确的,因为这反映了特朗普 alleged 的先前行为及其实施卡罗尔在诉讼中所称那种行为的倾向。

They also pointed out that the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the jury verdict in a 2024 ruling, found that the issues about which evidence should have been admitted at trial were not a determining factor in upholding the verdict.

他们还指出,总部位于纽约的美国第二巡回上诉法院在2024年的一项裁决中维持了陪审团 verdict,并认定关于哪些证据应在审判中采纳的问题,并非维持 verdict 的决定性因素。

Carroll filed a separate defamation claim against Trump not at issue at the Supreme Court that led to a $83.3 million judgment. That earlier case, concerning statements Trump made while serving his first term in office, is still on appeal. Trump argues that the claims should be dismissed on the basis of presidential immunity.

卡罗尔针对特朗普提起了一项单独的诽谤索赔,但这并非最高法院审理的争议焦点,此前已判给她8330万美元的赔偿金。那起涉及特朗普在第一个总统任期内所作言论的先前案件仍在上诉中。特朗普辩称,应基于总统豁免权驳回这些主张。

#4 No.1521961
Anonymous · 2026-06-29 17:41

>>1521949

>Trump's lawyers also said Kaplan should not have allowed jurors to view the infamous "Access Hollywood" tape in which Trump could be heard speaking disparagingly about women

>特朗普的律师还称,卡普兰不应允许陪审团观看臭名昭著的“好莱坞通道”录音带,其中可听到特朗普贬低女性的言论

Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.

你在法庭上说的一切都有可能并且将会被用来反对你。

Miranda is law school 101. Tell it to the Supreme Justice(s), Trump, they'll file your frivolous lawsuit in the round file while pointing and laughing at you as you leave that SCOTUS building utterly humiliated. Again.

米兰达警告是法学院的基础课。把它告诉最高法院的大法官们吧,特朗普,他们会把你的琐碎诉讼直接扔进废纸篓,同时在你离开最高法院大楼时指着你的鼻子嘲笑,让你再次彻底蒙羞。

#5 No.1521962
Anonymous · 2026-06-29 17:43

>>1521948

After they told you to go fuck yourself three times, you could always try and regain your litigational credibility by trying again in Scotland's courts to try and have those wind turbines near your golf course there removed. Fourth time must be the charm, after no less than the SCOTUS have proven you're a rapist, Trump: and there's less than fuck all you can do about it.

在他们三次叫你“滚蛋”之后,你总可以尝试通过在苏格兰法院再次尝试移除你高尔夫球场附近的那些风力涡轮机,来重新挽回你的诉讼信誉。既然连最高法院都证明了你是个强奸犯,第四次一定能成,特朗普:对此你几乎无能为力。

You are now officially a sex offender: and you don't have the legal right to deny it, Diddler Don.

你现在正式成为一名性犯罪者了:而且你没有法律权利否认这一点,爱摸大权的唐纳德(Diddler Don)。

#6 No.1521964
Anonymous · 2026-06-29 18:17

>>1521948

>First and only president to be impeached twice

>首位也是唯一一位被弹劾两次的总统

>First and only president to have members of his own party vote to convict him and expel him from office

>首位也是唯一一位本党成员投票支持定罪并罢免其职务的总统

>First and only convicted felon to be elected president

>首位也是唯一一位被定罪为重罪犯却当选总统的人

>First and only president to have been found liable for sexual assault by a court of law

>首位也是唯一一位被法院判定负有性侵犯责任的总统

I'm starting to think this Trump fella might not be a great guy

我开始觉得这位特朗普先生可能不是个什么好人

#7 No.1521970
Anonymous · 2026-06-29 20:01

>>1521948

Who wants to bet this was a 5-4 ruling with the usual far right fascist judges trying to get it overturned.

谁敢打赌这是一次5比4的裁决,通常那些极端右翼法西斯法官会试图推翻它。

#8 No.1521974
Anonymous · 2026-06-29 20:26

>>1521970

The court didn't even bother to take the case, they just said the lower court ruling against him stands

法院甚至懒得受理这个案子,他们只是说下级法院针对他的裁决依然有效

There's really nothing left that can be done by Trump or any of his loyalists

特朗普或任何他的忠实追随者真的已无事可做

Trump is an adjudicated rapist and now he's on the hook for millions of dollars for defaming his victim

特朗普已被裁定为强奸犯,如今他因诽谤受害者而背负数百万美元的债务

Of course, he'll spend his few remaining years jumping through legal hoops to avoid ever giving her a dime, but that won't change the fact that the ruling stands.

当然,他会花掉剩下的几年时间在法律程序中绕圈子,就是不肯给她一分钱,但这并不能改变判决依然有效的现实。

#9 No.1521983
Anonymous · 2026-06-29 23:51

>>1521948

>SCOTUS Confirms Donald Trump is a Rapist

>最高法院确认唐纳德·特朗普是强奸犯

Not how the US works, foreign Zoomer.

美国人可不是这么运作的,外国的Zoomer(千禧末/Z世代年轻人)。

Btw, what evidence is there that Trump raped Jean Carroll?

顺便问一句,有什么证据证明特朗普强奸了简·卡罗尔?

#10 No.1521984
Anonymous · 2026-06-29 23:55

>>1521983

She sayed it fifty years after it happen.

她在那件事发生五十年后才这么说。

Them crime was so big even NY changed them laws right before im.

那罪行大得连纽约都在我出生前立刻修改了相关法律。

#11 No.1521985
Anonymous · 2026-06-29 23:59

>>1521983

>I-it doesn't count, it's a WITCH HUUUUUUNT!

>这不算数,这是一场猎巫活UUUUUU动!

Why didn't Thomas or Alito even bother writing dissents for the court not taking the case if Trump is so obviously in the right? They wrote dissents for the court not taking Alan Dershowitz's defamation case against CNN today during the same batch of rulings.

如果特朗普如此明显地站在有理的一方,为什么托马斯和阿利托法官甚至懒得为最高法院拒绝受理此案撰写异议意见?就在今天这批裁决中,他们为最高法院拒绝受理艾伦·德肖维茨对CNN的诽谤案撰写了异议意见。

Let me guess: Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are part of the secret DNC DSA deep state cabal against Trump

让我猜猜:克拉伦斯·托马斯和塞缪尔·阿利托是秘密的民主党全国委员会、民主党社会主义者分部(DSA)深层政府反对特朗普的阴谋团伙的一部分。

#12 No.1521986
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:08

>>1521985

buts its not FAAAIR

但这不公平

trump ran out the clock

特朗普靠耗尽时间拖赢了

sure he's a rapist but the timer ran out so he's not just let trump win

就算他是强奸犯,但诉讼时效已过,所以不能就这么让特朗普赢

#13 No.1521988
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:14

>>1521985

SCOTUS hates reviewing evidence or any fact finding. They really only ever rule on questions of how the law is interpreted or applied.

最高法院讨厌审查证据或进行任何事实认定。他们真的只针对法律如何被解释或适用的问题进行裁决。

If you dig into the questions posed it might be obvious that the appeal didn't ask the right questions.

如果你深入审视提出的问题,可能会很明显看出,上诉并没有提出正确的问题。

The true problem with the case is a civil case "finding guilty" for a serious criminal felony that had no supporting criminal case.

此案真正的问题在于,在一个没有支持性刑事诉讼的严重刑事重罪案件中,进行民事诉讼中的“定罪”。

For murders there is a civil "wrongful death" lawsuit, but those lawsuits either cite the criminal case or prove the wrongful death through a chain of liability.

对于谋杀案,有民事上的“非正常死亡”诉讼,但这些诉讼要么引用刑事案件,要么通过责任链来证明非正常死亡。

The trump case also had some problems with late filings and "not taking the case seriously" causing a few losses by default.

特朗普案还有一些提交文件延迟和“不认真对待此案”的问题,导致了几次缺席败诉。

I'm too lazy to read myself, go do some research.

我太懒得去读了,自己去查查吧。

#14 No.1521990
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:21

>>1521985

That's a lot of words to just say

说了这么多字,其实就为了表达

>I'm a foreign Zoomer who doesn't know how the American judicial system works

>我是个不了解美国司法系统如何运作的外国Zoomer

>>1521986

>sure he's a rapist

>就算他是强奸犯

Proofs? We ask this every time it comes up and none of you ever have any evidence beyond "I'm an NPC and other people told me Trump is a rapist so it must be true"

证据呢?每次提到这件事我们都这么问,而你们中没有任何人拿出任何证据,除了“我是个NPC,别人告诉我特朗普是强奸犯,所以那一定是真的”。

#15 No.1521991
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:23

>>1521988

Honestly it's just nice to know he took at least one break from raping children to rape an adult woman

说实话,知道他至少从强奸儿童中抽空出来强奸了一名成年女性,感觉还不错。

#16 No.1521992
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:23

>>1521988

>I'm too lazy to read myself, go do some research.

>我太懒得去读了,自己去查查吧。

No, I'm gay and too busy getting shit on my peepee to care. Call me when you need a smug remark, based on zero factual evidence about the orange faggt.

不,我是同性恋,而且忙着处理自己蛋蛋上的屎没空关心。等你需要一句沾沾自喜的话时再叫我吧,基于关于那个橙色种马零事实证据的言论。

#17 No.1521993
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:25

>>1521990

>Proofs

lol he was found guilty in civil

lol 他在民事法庭被判有罪了

#18 No.1521994
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:27

>>1521990

Really seems like Clarence Thomas or Samuel Alito would have said SOMETHING about such an obvious witch hunt

克拉伦斯·托马斯或塞缪尔·阿利托真的会对如此明显的猎巫行动说点什么

Why do you think they didn't bother?

为什么你认为他们懒得这么做?

#19 No.1521997
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:30

>>1521993

>I'm an NPC and other people told me Trump is a rapist so it must be true

>我是个NPC,别人告诉我特朗普是强奸犯,所以那一定是真的

lmao this is pathetic.

笑死,这太可悲了。

>guilty in civil

>民事有罪

Not how the American justice system works, foreign Zoomer.

美国司法系统可不是这么运作的,外国的Zoomer。

I accept your concession though, add it to the other 100 threads where you were asked for evidence and couldn't provide any evidence beyond "I'm an NPC and other people told me Trump is a rapist so it must be true"

不过我接受你的让步,把它算进你被要求提供证据却除了“我是个NPC,别人告诉我特朗普是强奸犯所以一定是真的”之外拿不出任何证据的其他100个帖子里吧

#20 No.1521998
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:36

>>1521991

He fingered her ass, like Pete Buttgieg does to his adopted male child.

他用手指插入了她的肛门,就像皮特·布蒂吉格对他养的那个男小孩做的那样。

#21 No.1521999
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:37

>>1521994

>Really seems like I am both a foreigner and a Zoomer so I have no idea what SCOTUS even does

>看起来我真是个既不懂外国事又是Zoomer(千禧/后千禧一代),所以我根本不知道最高法院到底是干嘛的

Yeah, I know

是啊,我知道

#22 No.1522000
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:37

>>1521998

Was it difficult for you to type that with one hand down your pants?

你一只手插在裤子里打这些话,很难受吗?

#23 No.1522001
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:39

>>1521999

>No answer

>没有回答

I acknowledge your concession, but do not accept it.

我承认你的让步,但我不接受。

You'll have to beg harder

你得求得更诚恳点

#24 No.1522002
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:43

>>1522000

We got it on tape where he's talking about how to punish the boy, "Just stick it in his ass!"

我们有录音,他在谈论怎么惩罚那个男孩,“直接插进他肛门里!”

I think he's was likely emboldened by Biden molesting his child and receiving zero repercussions because he's a Democrat.

我觉得他大概是受到了拜登性侵自己孩子却零后果的鼓励,毕竟拜登是民主党人。

Just imagine voting for Joe a man who even gave Obama the "ick" and thinking anything you say is worth anything.

就想想吧,你居然投票给乔·拜登,连奥巴马都觉得他让人“不适”,还觉得你自己说的话有什么分量。

#25 No.1522003
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:46

>>1522001

The "answer" is that's not how the US judicial system works you foreign Zoomer. You have no idea what SCOTUS even is and you know nothing about the US government.

你的“回答”是:美国司法体系不是这么运作的,你这个外国Zoomer。你根本不知道最高法院是啥,对美国政治更是一窍不通。

#26 No.1522005
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:46

>>1522001

Btw if we're talking about no answer where is the answer to

顺便说一句,如果咱们在说“没有回答”,那对于下面这个问题的回答在哪

>Proofs? We ask this every time it comes up and none of you ever have any evidence beyond "I'm an NPC and other people told me Trump is a rapist so it must be true"

>证据?我们每次提出这个问题时,你们当中除了“我是个NPC,别人告诉我特朗普是强奸犯所以一定是真的”之外,从来拿不出任何证据

#27 No.1522006
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:46

He raped her. I can feel it in my dark brown homosexual bones. That's why it was important this was brought to court (preceding an election, after decades of inaction).

他强奸了她。我能从我深棕色的同性恋骨髓里感受到这一点。这就是为什么要把这事带上法庭很重要(在选举前夕,在几十年的不作为之后)。

#28 No.1522009
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 00:49

>>1522002

>Mentally unstable pedophile writing CSAM political fanfiction with one hand down his pants

>精神不稳定的恋童癖,一边把手插在裤子里,一边撰写涉及儿童色情内容的政治同人小说

This board has really hit rock bottom

这个板块真的跌到谷底了

#29 No.1522010
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 01:01

FADE IN:

INT. HOTEL SUITE - NIGHT (NOVEMBER 2020)

The room is dimly lit by a single lamp. Campaign posters and legal pads are scattered across every surface. A large TV flickers with muted election coverage — maps slowly turning red and blue.

房间只靠一盏台灯昏暗地照明。竞选海报和便签纸散落在每一个平面上。一台大电视正闪烁播放着无声的选举报道——地图慢慢变成红色和蓝色。

SAM BECKETT (in the body of JOE BIDEN, late 30s, wearing a dark suit and aviators perched on his head) stares at his reflection in a gilded mirror. He touches his own face, startled by the familiar smile.

萨姆·贝克特(寄宿在乔·拜登体内,三十多岁末,身穿深色西装,飞行员墨镜架在头顶)盯着镀金镜子里的倒影。他触摸自己的脸,被那熟悉的笑容吓了一跳。

SAM

(under his breath, classic Beckett confusion)

(低声嘀咕,经典的贝克特式困惑)

"Oh boy..."

“天哪……”

He turns, nearly knocking over a half-empty glass of chocolate milk on the nightstand.

他转过身,差点打翻床头柜上喝剩半杯的巧克力牛奶。

SAM

Al? Al, where are you? I feel like I’ve been asleep for a hundred years... and somebody replaced my knees with bagpipes.

阿尔?阿尔,你在哪?我感觉自己好像睡了一百年……而且有人把我的膝盖换成了风笛。

A shimmering blue doorway appears. ADMIRAL AL CALAVICCI steps through, dressed in a loud Hawaiian shirt and holding a cigar. He looks unusually grim.

一扇闪烁的蓝色传送门出现。阿尔·卡拉维西将军走了进来,穿着一件花哨的夏威夷衬衫,叼着一根雪茄。他看起来异常阴沉。

AL

Sam, we got a doozy this time. You’re Joseph R. Biden, Wilmington, Delaware. It’s late November, 1988. Bush Sr has just been elected president.

萨姆,这次我们遇到个大麻烦。你是约瑟夫·R·拜登,住在特拉华州威尔明顿。时间是1988年11月底。老布什刚刚当选总统。

SAM

The election... but why am I Joseph Biden?

选举……但为什么我是约瑟夫·拜登?

AL

(tapping his handlink, which beeps erratically)

(敲击着他的手持通讯器,它发出杂乱的蜂鸣声)

Its not about this election, Sam. Its about the one in 2020. America is going to be destroyed if Donald Trump doesn't get a second term as president.

这跟这场选举无关,萨姆。这是关于2020年的那场选举。如果唐纳德·特朗普没能连任总统,美国将会被毁灭。

Sam sits heavily on the edge of the bed, rubbing his temples.

山姆沉重地坐在床边沿,揉着太阳穴。

SAM

Al, I’m a scientist, not a... whatever this is. What does now have to do with an election that won't happen for another 30 years?

阿尔,我是科学家,不是……这鬼东西。这跟30年后才会有的选举有什么关系?

AL

Sam, the work you did sending those emails as Hunter Biden didn't work. We need to Biden even more unelectable.

山姆,你冒充亨特·拜登发邮件那套没起作用。我们需要让拜登更没人敢选。

Sam, you're going to have to molest Joseph Bidens daughter.

山姆,你得去猥亵约瑟夫·拜登的女儿。

#30 No.1522011
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 01:04

>>1522009

it is pretty sad isn't it. you'd think the shills would just spam the board with whataboutism instead of showing their true rapist/pedophile colors like this

真是挺惨的,是吧?你原以为那些水军只会到处刷屏搞“那又怎样”的逻辑谬误,而不是像这样暴露他们真正的人渣/恋童癖嘴脸

#31 No.1522015
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 01:39

>>1522011

I mean, they're all talking about Biden "molesting his daughter," based on evidence of a stolen dairy that doesn't make that claim: https://archive.ph/olt8W

And that she's essentially renounced in a letter to the judge sentencing one of the thieves: https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/654c5f7182bca1ee/6fe57478-full.pdf

"I will forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be viewed online . Repeatedly, I hear others grossly

“我将永远要面对我的私人日记被在网上查看的事实。我反复听到别人极度

misinterpret my once-private writings and lob false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love."

曲解我曾经的私人 writings(文字),并抛出诽谤我及其我爱之人品格的虚假指控。”

So how are they not spamming whataboutisms? 'Cause it's bullshit? They're still trying.

所以它们怎么没刷屏搞“那又怎样”?因为这全是扯淡?他们还在硬撑。

#32 No.1522016
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 01:43

>>1522015

How many people are doing this? Imagine sticking up for a pedo

有多少人干这事?想象一下为一个恋童癖辩护

#33 No.1522017
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 01:46

>>1522010

>Sam, you're going to have to molest Joseph Bidens daughter.

>山姆,你得去猥亵约瑟夫·拜登的女儿。

And we still got the bad ending.

我们还是得到了坏结局。

I'm the plus side we did learn that Democrats will literally destroy the country of it thinks they can win an election.

至少我们学到了一点:民主党人如果以为能赢下选举,真的会把国家毁掉。

#34 No.1522020
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 02:30

>>1522015

Fox News tried to defend themselves reporting lies as truth because reporting opinions is covered by the first amendment.

福克斯新闻试图把谎言当新闻来报道以自辩,理由是报道意见受第一修正案保护。

There's no shame for people capable of this level of faggotry.

能干出这种婊味十足的事,真是一点羞耻心都没有。

#35 No.1522021
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 02:55

>>1522015

>>1522020

https://snopes.news/2024-05-14-snopes-reverses-fact-check-ashley-biden-diary-authentic.html

>“Was I molested?” She had written in the diary. She also stated that she had been hyper-sexualized” as a child and had taken “probably not appropriate” showers with her father, Joe Biden.

>“我被猥亵了吗?”她在日记里写道。她还表示自己在童年时被过度性化,并且曾和父亲乔·拜登一起洗“可能不太合适”的澡。

Hmm.

#36 No.1522022
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 02:58

>>1522021

it's funny how conservatives can do things like steal someone's personal belongings and then turn around and pretend to sympathize for their own victims

挺有意思的,保守派能偷别人的私人物品,转头又假装同情受害者

#37 No.1522024
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 03:13

>>1522005

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/23-793/23-793-2024-12-30.html

It's written at a 12th grade level. That maybe too high for you, migger.

这写作水平有12年级。对你来说可能太高了,黑鬼。

#38 No.1522025
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 03:15

>>1522022

It's funny how you think this minimizes Biden's child molestation.

你居然以为这能淡化拜登猥亵儿童的事。

#39 No.1522026
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 03:19

>>1522025

you're projecting again. stay on topic, and if you have to lie, come up with something new while you're at it

你又在投射了。专心点,如果非要撒谎,那就编点新花样

#40 No.1522027
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 03:20

>>1522022

Ashley Biden lost her diary. Like Hunter Biden lost his laptop

阿什莉·拜登丢了日记。就像亨特·拜登丢了笔记本电脑

#41 No.1522028
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 03:25

>>1522021

>pastes an article that says the diary was verified to be Ashley Biden's.

>粘贴了一篇文章,声称日记经核实是阿什莉·拜登的。

>verified the diary was Ashley Biden's. The claims inside are not verified and have been denied publicly by her.

>日记确认为阿什莉·拜登所写。里面的指控未经核实,且她已公开否认。

>Takes an out of context quote from the page I directly linked to as proof in: >>1522015

>从 >>1522015 中直接引用的那段脱离上下文的句子中截取引文作为证据

The full quote is: "What is this due to. Was I molested. I think so? I do remember trauma - I remember not liking the woolzack's house; I remember somewhat being sexualized with caroline; I remember having sex with friends @ a young age; showers w/ my dad, (probably not appropriate), Being turned on when I wasn't supposed to be."

完整引文是:“这是怎么回事。我被猥亵了吗?我想是吧?我记得有创伤——我记得不喜欢woolzack的房子;我记得被卡罗琳性化过;我记得很小就和朋友们做过爱;和老爸洗澡,(可能不太合适),不该兴奋的时候却兴奋了。”

You could've read that in her own handwriting if you clicked the link. You didn't because you're a dishonest dipshit and you're hoping people won't fact-check your bullshit propaganda. Kill yourself.

你点开链接就能看到她亲笔手写的原文。你没点是因为你是个肮脏的混蛋,指望别人不会核实你那些狗屁宣传。去死吧。

#42 No.1522031
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 03:33

>>1522024

>It's written at a 12th grade level.

>这写作水平有12年级。

Is that why you didn't read it? Kek, it's amazing that your little NPC programming made you think this was somehow a win. You literally just proved my point which is why you just dropped a link (that you didn't read) without actually answering the question

所以这就是你为什么不读它的原因?笑死,你那点NPC式的编程逻辑居然让你觉得这算什么胜利。你明明刚刚证明了我的观点,所以你就甩了一个链接(你根本没读)来逃避回答问题。

>I'll bet he didn't know that there was a lawsuit in which other people said they think Trump is a rapist without any evidence. I'll post the link (without actually reading it) that will totally blow his mind!!!

>我敢打赌他不知道有起诉讼案,里面其他人声称认为特朗普是强奸犯但毫无证据。我会发个链接(我自己都没看),绝对会震惊到他!!!

all it did was confirm your concession

这恰恰证实了你的让步。

>Wait, I'm going to drop one of those epic 4chan buzzwords so they won't realize what an obvious outsider I am

>等等,我要扔出一个4chan的史诗级黑话,这样他们就不会意识到我是个明显的局外人了。

Too bad it didn't work

可惜没起作用。

#43 No.1522032
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 03:37

>>1522031

god you're esl

天哪,你是ESL(英语非母语者)吧

#44 No.1522036
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 03:47

>>1521974

You absolutely know the extreme far right judges like Roberts, Alito and Thomas wanted to overturn it for trump.

你完全知道那些极右翼法官,比如罗伯茨、阿利托和托马斯,是想推翻那个判决来帮特朗普。

#45 No.1522039
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 03:57

>>1522032

>>1522024

>>1522005

>>1522003

So another easy win for us Chuds? Will the teenage leftists of /news/ ever won a debate or will they just keep getting brutally humiliated like this?

所以这又让我们这些“韭菜”轻松赢了一局?/news/ 的那帮青春期左翼 ever 赢过一次辩论吗,还是说他们就只会像这样被残酷羞辱?

#46 No.1522040
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 03:58

>>1522039

see>>1522032

#47 No.1522051
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 04:56

>>1521964

The sad part is a third of the country legitimately believes that all these are a result of some deep state going after Trump because he's the only billionaire Epstein elite that for some reason cares about the common folk and somehow fights for them everyday. Rather than Trump being a convicted criminal that has backstabbed anyone whos helped him to save his own skin. But hey, im sure any minute now Trumps going to drain that swamp.

最可悲的是,三分之一的人真心相信这一切都是“深层政府”针对特朗普的结果,因为他是个唯利是图的埃普斯坦精英,却因为某些原因关心普通民众,并且每天都在为他们战斗。而不是说特朗普是个有犯罪前科、为了自保而背叛任何帮助过他的人的人。不过嘿,我敢保证特朗普马上就要把那个沼泽抽干了。

#48 No.1522070
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 09:20

Trump is a proven sex offender, and there's less than nothing that liggy miggy piggies such as 1522025 can do about it, other than deflect & project.

特朗普是确凿的性罪犯,那些liggy miggy piggy(注:反犹/种族歧视用语)之类的1522025对此无能为力,只会转移话题和投射而已。

#49 No.1522071
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 10:48

>>1522070

>t. registered sex offender.

>t. 注册性犯罪者。

#50 No.1522072
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 11:58

>>1521990

trumps mentor was a gay aids infested jew. enough proof for me.

特朗普的导师是个感染艾滋病同性恋犹太人。这就够了。

#51 No.1522073
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 12:11

Trump is a proven sex offender, and there's less than nothing that liggy miggy piggies can do about it, other than deflect & project

特朗普是确凿的性罪犯,那些liggy miggy piggy对此无能为力,只会转移话题和投射。

>deflect & project

>转移话题和投射

1522071

>t. projecting SCOTUS-proven sex offender defender, thus is a registered sex offender

>t. 投射型SCOTUS(最高法院)确认的性罪犯辩护者,因此也是个注册性犯罪者。

QED.

#52 No.1522078
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 15:27

>>1522073

>>1522040

See >>1522039

The thread is over. Chuds are objectively proven factually correct once again. Leftists entire argument is, once again, "I'm an NPC who can't think for myself but other people said that they think Trump is a rapist so that's all the proof I need"

帖子结束了。韭菜们再次被客观事实证实是对的。左派的全部论点就是:“我是NPC,无法独立思考,但别人说他们认为特朗普是强奸犯,这就是我需要的一切证据。”

Facts > Feelings

事实 > 感觉

#53 No.1522079
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 15:47

>silly lib, just because you rape someone that doesn't mean you're a rapist

>傻逼自由派,就算你强奸了别人,也不代表你就是强奸犯。

#54 No.1522080
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 15:59

>>1522017

>I'm the plus side we did learn that Democrats will literally destroy the country of it thinks they can win an election.

>如果民主党认为能赢下选举,他们就会真的把这个国家毁掉,这是我们要做的正面贡献。

How many people has Trump pardoned for money?

特朗普为了钱赦免了多少人?

How many opponents has he opened bullshit cases against using the FBI?

他利用FBI向多少对手发起了胡说八道的案件?

How many no-bid contracts to do shit no one asked for?

多少没人要求的无标合同被拿去瞎搞?

And then there's Epstein...

还有爱泼斯坦的事……

#55 No.1522081
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 16:00

>>1522028

>MAGAchuds: *crickets*

>MAGA韭菜:*死寂*

I think it's safe to say that you bodied that virgin freak into the troposphere.

我觉得可以安全地说,你把那个处男怪人打进了平流层。

#56 No.1522082
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 16:03

>>1522080

The right is all projection.

右派全是投射。

They only seem legitimate because you're replying to them. ESL shill is a tranny obsessed foreign retard who should be on a watchlist in the off chance they're not already.

他们看起来似乎有道理,只是因为你还在回复他们。那个ESL(英语作为第二语言)水军是个痴迷跨性别者的外国白痴,不管有没有,都应该被列入监视名单。

You're using facts and logic against someone who tries to get femboys to pee in their mouth as often as possible

你拿事实和逻辑去跟一个拼命想让“奶子男”尽可能多往嘴里尿的人辩论,真是白费力气。

#57 No.1522087
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 16:35

1522071

1522078

See >>1522032 >>1522070 >>1522073

The thread is over. Those who aren't rightards are objectively proven to be superior again and again. Rightards' entire argument is, as always, "I'm an orange sex offender-defending NPC who can't think for myself but other rightard subhumans say - but can't think otherwise because they would commit thoughtcrime if they agreed with the SCOTUS that Trump is a rapist - that Trump can never be a rapist or any other form of inferior subhuman, so that's all the proof I need".

这帖子该结束了。那些不是右翼脑残的人再次被客观证明是优越的。右翼脑残们一如既往地论证道:“我是个支持橙色性犯罪者的NPC,我自己不会思考,只听其他右翼亚人的——当然,如果他们同意最高法院认定特朗普是强奸犯,那就等于思想犯罪,所以他们不能这么想——反正特朗普永远不可能是强奸犯或其他任何低等亚人,这就足够当我的证据了”。

Reality: SCOTUS concluding that Trump is a rapist >>>>> rightards' eternally wrong opinions.

现实情况:最高法院认定特朗普是强奸犯 >>>>> 右翼脑残那永远错误的观点。

#58 No.1522090
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 16:47

>>1522080

>And then there's Epstein...

>还有爱泼斯坦……

Democrats had decades to release the files but instead protected Epstein.

民主党人有几十年的时间可以公开文件,但他们反而保护了爱泼斯坦。

Reminder: Epstein was released during Obama's term.

提醒一下:爱泼斯坦是在奥巴马任期内被释放的。

#59 No.1522092
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 16:56

Trump had years to release the files but instead not only protected himself by not releasing the files - except for the names of the victims - unredacted, but is protected by the likes of the projecting 1522090.

特朗普有多年时间公开文件,但他不仅没有公开未删减的文件来保护自己(除了受害者的名字),还受到像1522090这种投射心魔之人的保护。

Reminder: Obama & Biden's names aren't in the Epstein files but the likes of the projecting, deflecting & Trump-protecting liggy miggy piggy 1522090 don't want Trump imprisoned, thus is reduced to whataboutism.

提醒一下:奥巴马和拜登的名字不在爱泼斯坦文件中,但像1522090这种搞投射、转移话题并保护特朗普的“愚蠢小粉红猪”不希望特朗普入狱,因此只能堕落到使用“那又怎么说”的诡辩。

#60 No.1522095
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 17:12

>>1522092

>not only protected himself by not releasing the files

>不仅没有公开未删减的文件来保护自己

He did though. The names of the victims are redacted too.

他其实公开了。受害者的名字也被删减了。

You're literally making shit up to get mad about. Kill yourself.

你 literally 在编造废话来找生气。去死吧。

#61 No.1522097
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 17:21

imagine being a broke esl shill sucking billionaire dick ad infinitum. couldn't be me

想象一下,作为一个破产的非英语母语水军,没完没了地舔着亿万富翁的鸡巴。我可干不出这种事。

#62 No.1522100
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 17:28

He didn't release them unredacted - except for the victims' names - thus Trump protected himself, just as you're protecting him, 1522095.

他没有公开未删减的文件——除了受害者的名字——因此特朗普保护了自己,就像你,1522095,在保护他一样。

You're literally making shit up after becoming mad by >>1522092. Your credibility was killed way before now, due to you protecting the now SCOTUS-proven rapist that is Trump.

你 literal 地在 >>1522092 之后变着法编造废话来生气。你的信誉早就死了,因为你一直在保护现在被最高法院证实的强奸犯特朗普。

Even Nixon was forced to release the Watergate tapes & transcripts completely unredacted, even though he knew it would destroy him. And so what? So what if the Epstein Files with all the perpetrators' names unredacted would destroy the Republicans as a whole, and Trump along with them? Good.

就连尼克松也被迫完全公开未删减的水门事件录音带和转录文本,尽管他知道这会毁了他。那又怎样?如果公开所有未删减的 perpetrators 名字的爱泼斯坦文件会摧毁整个共和党以及特朗普,那又怎样?好得很。

By not releasing those files unredacted - except for the victims' names - Trump's & your credibility is already destroyed.

特朗普没有公开那些未删减的文件——除了受害者的名字——这已经摧毁了特朗普和你的信誉。

#63 No.1522102
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 17:30

>>1522097

Trump failed to bury yet another detailed report of him raping children, and the full thing should be released Thursday

特朗普未能掩盖又一份关于他强奸儿童的详细报告,完整内容将于周四公布

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clinton-judge-orders-doj-unseal-epstein-files-has-been-keeping-hidden

Don't worry though, ESL shill is on the case to explain that this was really deepstate agents slandering Trump before he became president back when he was a Democrat and thats why Dems are evil

不过别担心,非英语母语水军正在忙着解释这其实是深层政府特工在特朗普还是民主党人时为了诋毁他而散布的谣言,这就是为什么民主党人是邪恶的

#64 No.1522103
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 17:31

>>1522099

>He didn't release them unredacted

>他没有公开未删减的文件

They had photos and names of the victims in them you egregious faggot.

里面还有受害者照片和名字,你这个令人作呕的婊子货。

Do you know why child porn is prosecuted so heavily? Because every time that material is shared it re-victimizes the victims.

你知道为什么儿童色情制品会受到严厉起诉吗?因为每次分享这类材料,都会让受害者二次受害。

You're unironically getting mad that the DOJ isn't allowing faggots like you to harass the victims because you want to dunk on a guy that is leaving office in two years.

你居然真为司法部不允许你这种gay货骚扰受害者而生气,就为了在离下台只剩两年的那个人身上找存在感。

#65 No.1522104
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 17:34

>>1522087

>look mommy I'm shitposting XD

>看啊妈妈,我在水帖 XD

I wish there was a way to actually enforce Rule 2

真希望有什么办法能真正落实版规2

#66 No.1522105
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 17:40

>>1522103

>>1522104

you should wish for a less humiliating life instead

你应该许愿过上别那么丢脸的人生才对

#67 No.1522106
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 17:40

After the midterms and both the Senate & HoR are under Democrat control, why shouldn't they force Trump to release the Epstein Files with all the perpetrators' names unredacted, just as Nixon was re. the Watergate transcripts? They wouldn't have a problem with any Democrats' names in said files: time to purge any & all vile elements, and come out of all this filthy episode as the morally superior party. The actual party of law and order.

如果中期选举后参众两院都由民主党控制,他们为什么不逼特朗普公布爱泼斯坦档案,把所有涉案人员名字都取消脱敏,就像尼克松公布水门事件录音带那样?他们一点也不介意档案里有民主党人的名字:是时候清除所有邪恶势力,从这堆肮脏的丑闻中脱身,成为道德上的优越方。这才是真正的守法秩序党。

The Republicans are nothing more than a bunch of chaotic, corrupt & pedophilic subhumans: but then, as proven by the fact that the GOP - Gang Of Pedophiles - still refuse to make child marriages illegal in certain states, people already knew about that.

共和党不过就是一群混乱、腐败且恋童的非人蝼蚁:但正如GOP(恋童帮)至今仍在某些州拒绝将儿童婚姻定为非法所证明的那样,人们早就知道这回事了。

#68 No.1522108
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 17:45

>He didn't release them unredacted

>他没有公开未删减的文件

This is why you're getting mad and projecting by claiming others are when they're pointing & laughing at you reacting the way you are, 1522103 the egregious orange pedo defender.

这就是你为什么被指着鼻子嘲笑时,非要说别人在生气,其实是你自己在生气和投射罢了,1522103,那个 egregious 的橙色恋童辩护者。

#69 No.1522111
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 18:14

>>1522108

It shouldn't surprise you that MAGA wants to protect the people in the Epstein files

你不该惊讶,MAGA想要保护爱泼斯坦档案里的人。

It shouldn't even surprise you that MAGA is trying to defend the rapists instead of the victims

你甚至不该惊讶,MAGA在为强奸犯辩护而不是受害者。

#70 No.1522112
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 18:15

1522078

>look mommy I'm shitposting XD

>看啊妈妈,我在水帖 XD

1522104

The duality of the hypocrite.

伪君子的双重性。

#71 No.1522113
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 18:15

>The Republicans are nothing more than a bunch of chaotic, corrupt & pedophilic subhumans

>共和党不过就是一群混乱、腐败且恋童的非人童的非人蝼蚁

Daily reminder that California has made it legal for subhuman filth to not disclose the fact they have aids before infecting their partners.

每日提醒:加州已合法化,允许患有艾滋病的非人垃圾在感染伴侣前不披露病情。

#72 No.1522117
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 18:27

>>1522105

What's humiliating about being proven objectively correct over and over so much that the only response is the constant meltdowns and shitposting from leftists trying to cope with the fact that their view of reality is objectively indisputably false?

有什么好丢脸的?我被反复证明客观正确,而左派唯一的反应就是不断崩溃、水帖,试图 coping 他们眼中的现实在客观上无可辩驳地错误这一事实。

I mean, look at this guy: >>1522112 just completely mentally broken

看看这人:>>1522112 简直彻底精神崩溃了

#73 No.1522120
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 18:34

1522117 is proven wrong over and over so much that the only response is the constant meltdowns, projection and shitposting from rightists trying to cope with the proven fact that their view of reality is objectively and indisputably proven more than wrong.

1522117 被反复证明是错的,错到右派唯一的反应就是不断崩溃、投射和水帖,试图 coping 他们眼中的现实在客观上无可辩驳地错误这一事实。

I mean, look at 1522117, just completely mentally broken by just this instance of reality >>1521948 proving all of the rightard's opinions more than wrong.

看看 1522117 吧,仅仅因为现实 >>1521948 就证明右派的所有观点错得离谱,他就彻底精神崩溃了。

#74 No.1522121
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 18:35

Daily Reminder that Republicans refuse to make child marriages illegal in certain states, despite subhuman filth such as 1522113 defending the Gang Of Pedophiles, and proving how obsessed it is by being reduced to projection, deflection & whataboutism of the worst kind. Especially with the sort of obsessions the depraved degenerate liggy miggy piggy displays in its desperate bouts of whataboutism.

每日提醒:共和党拒绝在某些州将儿童婚姻定为非法,尽管像 1522113 这样的非人垃圾在为恋童帮辩护,并证明了自己多么痴迷于投射、转移话题和最糟糕的“whataboutism”。尤其是那种堕落变态的 liggy miggy piggy 在绝望的 whataboutism 中表现出的痴迷。

#75 No.1522164
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 23:02

So how many bots can't properly click a post to reply to it now?

所以现在有多少个机器人连点帖子回复都不会了?

#76 No.1522165
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 23:04

>1522078

Fact: Trump is a rapist in the eyes of the law.

事实:在法律眼中,特朗普是个强奸犯。

#77 No.1522166
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 23:04

>>1522164

none of them

都不是

#78 No.1522170
Anonymous · 2026-06-30 23:19

>>1522164

sure there's only 1 or at most 2 of these Zoomer NPCs, he's just very active because it's summer so he doesn't have school right now.

确实只有1个,最多2个这种Zoomer NPC,他只是因为现在是夏天不用上学,所以才这么活跃。

I wish he would get a hobby for the summer though, getting repeatedly BTFO and being proven objectively wrong (literally just pure facts) can't be good for his mental health, and his generation already struggles with that

我真希望他夏天能找个爱好,不然反复被BTFO(被彻底碾压)并且被证明是客观错误(纯粹的事实),对他的心理健康肯定没好处,而且他那一代人本来就有这方面的困扰。

#79 No.1522183
Anonymous · 2026-07-01 00:29

How many tourist newfags such as 1522164 1522166 1522170 don't know about how to deny others of '(You)'s?

像1522164、1522166、1522170这样的游客新手指们,到底还有多少人不知道如何拒绝别人使用“(You)”这种梗?

>>1522165 is a good posting example of how this works.

>>1522165 是个很好的发帖示例,说明了这玩意儿是怎么运作的。

#80 No.1522194
Anonymous · 2026-07-01 01:16

>>1522183

>I'm a teenage NPC who is desperately hoping nobody notices how badly I lost this argument

>我是个十几岁的NPC, desperate地希望没人注意到我这场辩论输得有多惨

Sorry kiddo but we all noticed

抱歉啊小孩儿,我们都注意到了。

#81 No.1522202
Anonymous · 2026-07-01 01:26

1522194

>I'm a projecting teenage NPC who is desperately coping

>我是个投射型十几岁NPC,绝望地自我安慰着

Sorry 1522194 but other people noticed. Speaking of which:

抱歉1522194,但其他人也注意到了。话说回来:

>we

Hi, coping NPC esl shill 1522194, hoping that nobody noticed how badly you lost not only this but all other arguments.

嗨,1522194,你这个指望没人注意到你在这场辩论以及其他所有辩论中都输得一塌糊涂的NPC、英语非母语的水军,你好。

#82 No.1522207
Anonymous · 2026-07-01 01:52

>>1522202

Its not that they need (You)'s, they need the links to put into their AI terminals to translate and keep track of each shill thread.

他们不是需要“(You)”这种梗,他们需要的是链接,好把这些链接放进他们的AI终端里进行翻译,并跟踪每一个水军帖子。

You're making them work harder to meet their metrics and thats just mean

你这是在给他们增加工作量以完成KPI,太坏了

#83 No.1522297
Anonymous · 2026-07-01 12:35

>>1522194

>>1522170

>>1522078

Well since nobody has replied to any of these comments I think we can safely assume that deep down even the teenage NPCs of/news/ know they lost

既然没人回复这些评论,我们可以安全地假设,即使/nc/区的十几岁NPC们内心深处也知道他们输了

#84 No.1522431
Anonymous · 2026-07-02 03:02

>>1521964

Clinton was the first black president but Trump is the first nigger president.

克林顿是美国第一位黑人总统,但特朗普是第一位黑鬼总统。

#85 No.1522715
Anonymous · 2026-07-04 01:16

>>1522070

Oh man a proven sex offender that sounds dangerous

哦天哪,一个被坐实的性犯罪者,听起来很危险啊

How long was his prison sentence? Did he get released on probation?

他的刑期有多久?他是假释出来的吗?

#86 No.1522792
Anonymous · 2026-07-04 11:46

1522715

>Oh man a proven sex offender that sounds dangerous

>哦天哪,一个被坐实的性犯罪者,听起来很危险啊

Yes, Trump is a proven dangerous sex offender, and there's less than nothing that liggy miggy piggies such as you can personally do about the SCOTUS proving that fact. And your wrong opinions on a backwater part of the internet will never change reality.

是的,特朗普是个被坐实的危险性犯罪者,而像你这般的“自由派猪猪”(liggy miggy piggies)个人对最高法院的这一认定毫无办法。你在网络边缘地带的错误观点永远改变不了现实。

How long was Bill Clinton's prison sentence? Did he get released on probation?

比尔·克林顿的刑期有多久?他是假释出来的吗?

>>1522297

Good post.

好帖子。

← 上一篇返回列表下一篇 →

(如果你觉得这篇文章有启发,可以点击这里付费