EUREKAR
Eurekar·TOP
捕捉真实世界的英语信号
34信息来源
13,006精选文章
168单词卡片
18照片图片
全部8,248口语2,075外贸4免费1,129帖子4,467新闻1,602hackernews1,197techmeme752tmz657slashdot529techcrunch507arstechnica431随笔330外刊291Cards168simonwillison100sethgodin60图片18information3

Goldman Sachs says AI is cutting 16,000 jobs a month

高盛称人工智能每月裁员 16,000 人

4chan /g/ · Anonymous · 2026-08-19 14:09 · 35 帖 · 原文 ↗

← 上一篇返回列表下一篇 →
#1 Goldman Sachs says AI is cutting 16,000 jobs a month / 高盛称人工智能每月裁员 16,000 人
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 14:09

Guys, it's over.

伙计们,结束了。

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1787148585218380.png

#2 No.109595919
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 14:10

Thanks for keeping me updated.

感谢您让我了解最新情况。

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1787148642915948.jpg

#3 No.109595921
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 14:10

That's the singularity.

这就是奇点。

#4 No.109595927
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 14:11

>Goldman

#5 No.109595937
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 14:12

>The bank's analysis shows a net loss nearing 25,000 positions monthly when factoring in limited new AI-created roles, with entry-level software jobs down 20 percent since 2024. It also reveals a growing wage gap, where AI exposure widens pay differences by 3.3 percent between new and experienced workers, as younger enthusiasm for the tech drops from 36 percent in 2025 to 22 percent this year.

>该银行的分析显示,考虑到人工智能创造的新职位有限,每月净流失近 25,000 个职位,入门级软件职位自 2024 年以来下降了 20%。它还揭示了工资差距不断扩大,人工智能使新员工和经验丰富的员工之间的薪酬差距扩大了 3.3%,因为年轻人对技术的热情从 2025 年的 36% 下降到今年的 22%。

>While economists call the overall drag modest so far, displacement outpaces retraining, raising questions about job churn tied directly to AI versus broader cost-cutting.

>虽然经济学家称迄今为止总体拖累不大,但失业的速度超过了再培训,引发了人们对与人工智能直接相关的工作流失而不是更广泛的成本削减的质疑。

#6 No.109596197
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 14:47

>>109595937

It may not be direct impact but the indirect impact is already too huge to ignore

也许不是直接影响,但间接影响已经大得不容忽视

#7 No.109596204
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 14:47

>>109595913

the future is going to be absolutely retarded

未来将是绝对滞后的

#8 No.109596206
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 14:48

>Guys, it's over.

> 伙计们,结束了。

For you. Get fucked.

为你。滚蛋吧。

#9 No.109596231
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 14:51

>>109595913

>hur durr pr

> 胡杜尔公关

the jobs are disappearing bc of overhiring useless activists that happened during the esg era, and outsourcing to india

由于 ESG 时代过度雇用无用的活动人士以及外包给印度,这些工作岗位正在消失

if ceos said "we fucked up and now esgkikes stopped paying"

如果 CEO 说“我们搞砸了,现在 esgkikes 停止付款了”

the stock prices would have plumetted

股价会暴跌

>ib4 how do YOU know

>ib4 你怎么知道

everyone's hiring. mostly in india.

每个人都在招聘。主要在印度。

including the tech fags producing the bespoke frontier models that outsmart everyone.

其中包括生产比所有人都聪明的定制前沿模型的技术狂人。

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1787151103027379.jpg

#10 No.109596241
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 14:52

>>109595913

bottom signal

底部信号

#11 No.109596298
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:01

>>109595913

Same gaslighting as covid causing all inflation.

与导致所有通货膨胀的新冠病毒一样的煤气灯。

AI has an impact on the job market, but most job loss right now is just the global economy taking a nosedive and they need to obfuscate it. Otherwise people might find out that most 'growth' os irrelevant electronic money schemes robbing them of material (real) wealth, making numbers go up while the economy 98% of the population actually live from is dying for reasons completly unrelated tonand despite AI.

人工智能对就业市场有影响,但目前大多数失业只是全球经济急剧下滑,他们需要混淆视听。否则,人们可能会发现,大多数“增长”都是无关紧要的电子货币计划,剥夺了他们的物质(真实)财富,使数字上升,而 98% 的人口实际赖以生存的经济却因为与人工智能完全无关的原因而消亡。

#12 No.109596312
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:03

>>109596298

/thread

#13 No.109596412
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:22

>>109595913

>cutting indians

>切割印第安人

Good thing

好东西

#14 No.109596440
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:24

>>109596412

its the exact opposite thats happening, though

但事实恰恰相反

cutting euros/unitedstatesians, delocalizing to bharat

削减欧元/美国人,转向巴拉特

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1787153087646188.png

#15 No.109596476
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:30

>>109596440

Well fuck

好吧他妈的

#16 No.109596487
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:31

SAY IT WITH ME: THANKYOUBASEDBOSNIANVIBEGODS

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1787153494202691.png

#17 No.109596537
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:36

>>109595913

what about the layoffs before that? some (not me, I fully believe mr sachs) might see it as a continuing trend in different clothing

那之前的裁员呢?有些人(不是我,我完全相信萨克斯先生)可能会将其视为不同服装的持续趋势

#18 No.109596558
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:41

>>109596298

What do they gain by saying AI is fucking things? Wouldn’t they say there’s nothing to worry about since there money is in AI too?

他们说人工智能是他妈的东西有什么好处?他们不是会说,人工智能也有钱,所以没什么好担心的吗?

The way people are dismissive about this makes me worry too.

人们对此不屑一顾的方式也让我感到担忧。

#19 No.109596569
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:42

>>109596487

>bosnian

ur too poor for a claude subscription wtf are you on about?

你太穷了,无法订阅克劳德,你在说什么吗?

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1787154150290090.png

#20 No.109596572
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:42

>>109596558

AI has upsides and downsides and is an impersonal global trend. The parasoric upper class has no upsides but an address.

人工智能有优点也有缺点,是一种客观的全球趋势。寄生上层阶级没有什么好处,只是有一个地址。

#21 No.109596652
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:55

>>109596558

>What do they gain by saying AI is fucking things?

>他们说人工智能是他妈的东西有什么好处?

A scapegoat that isn't them. duh

替罪羊不是他们。呃

#22 No.109596672
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 15:58

>>109595913

>Bank invested in AI says AI is winning

>投资人工智能的银行表示人工智能正在获胜

Remember 2007?

还记得2007年吗?

#23 No.109596694
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 16:00

People keep focusing on employers saving money but I don't think they realize the consumer benefits.

人们一直关注雇主省钱,但我认为他们没有意识到消费者的利益。

I would unironically rather talk to an AI than most customer service reps. I actually trust the generator that hallucinates because even with that in mind it still makes less mistakes less often than the uncaring underpaid person who couldn't give a shit about me, themselves, or their company. The robot doesn't care either but at least its apathy doesn't impair its ability to serve.

讽刺的是,我宁愿与人工智能交谈,也不愿与大多数客户服务代表交谈。我实际上信任产生幻觉的生成器,因为即使考虑到这一点,它仍然比那些漠不关心的低薪人员犯更少的错误,他们根本不在乎我、他们自己或他们的公司。机器人也不关心,但至少它的冷漠不会削弱它的服务能力。

If people had work ethic and cared about their fellow man I would be more empathetic and caring to them, but they don't care, so we may as well replace them with a machine that doesn't care either but is forced to do at least a mediocre job half of the time, because that's still more than humans are willing to do in these positions.

如果人们有职业道德并关心他们的同胞,我会更加同情和关心他们,但他们不在乎,所以我们不妨用一台也不关心但被迫至少有一半时间做平庸工作的机器来取代他们,因为这仍然比人类在这些职位上愿意做的要多。

#24 No.109596747
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 16:07

>>109596652

>>109596672

Which one is it, /g/?

是哪一个,/g/?

#25 No.109596879
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 16:21

>>109596206

For you too

也为你

You delusional pencil neck. Learn nursing.

你这个妄想的铅笔颈。学习护理。

#26 No.109596920
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 16:26

>>109596879

>For you too

>也为你

Why do you believe so :-)?

你为什么这么相信:-)?

#27 No.109597057
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 16:47

>>109596231

Entry level jobs are disappearing, genius

入门级工作正在消失,天才

There has been negative growth in entry level jobs

入门级职位出现负增长

#28 No.109597088
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 16:51

>>109596558

They need to layoff due to lack off money flowing. Laying off boosts stock value, turning the company AI friendly makes the stock value jump even higher

由于缺乏资金流动,他们需要裁员。裁员推升股价,公司AI友好化让股价跳得更高

Having said that AI is impacting layoffs just not as directly as it is being touted

话虽如此,人工智能对裁员的影响并不像人们吹捧的那么直接

#29 No.109599737
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 22:19

I needed 50 employees before ai now I need zero and a 100 dolla subscription

在人工智能出现之前我需要 50 名员工,现在我需要零个和 100 美元的订阅

#30 No.109599766
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 22:22

>>109595913

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1787178178534873.jpg

#31 No.109599788
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 22:26

>>109599737

Can you share your company name so we can avoid your slop "products" or is this business purely fictional?

您能否分享您的公司名称,以便我们避免使用您的劣质“产品”,或者该业务纯粹是虚构的?

#32 No.109599822
Anonymous · 2026-08-19 22:30

>>109595913

This is literally a holocaust. I can't go back to India, I already started building my American dream here. Job openings for H-1Bs have dried up and I don't know what to do bros!

这实际上是一场大屠杀。我不能回印度,我已经开始在这里建立我的美国梦了。 H-1B 的职位空缺已经枯竭,我不知道该怎么办,兄弟们!

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1787178658519399.png

#33 No.109600361
Anonymous · 2026-08-20 00:12

>>109595913

Hurry up and get it to cut 16,000 jobs per hour.

赶快让它每小时削减16,000个工作岗位。

#34 No.109600454
Anonymous · 2026-08-20 00:34

>>109595913

They're using AI as an excuse to fire people to save face after realizing they've kept employees doing bullshit jobs on their payroll for years. It's a nothingburger.

在意识到多年来他们一直让员工在工资单上做垃圾工作后,他们以人工智能为借口解雇员工以保全面子。这是一个没什么的汉堡。

#35 No.109600493
Anonymous · 2026-08-20 00:43

>>109599822

a dense retard is gonna think this is real

一个智障者会认为这是真的

← 上一篇返回列表下一篇 →

(如果你觉得这篇文章有启发,可以点击这里付费