Why isn't anyone using this? is it worse than Fedora immutable?
为什么没人用这个?它比Fedora immutable差吗?
为什么没人用这个?它比Fedora immutable差吗?
Why isn't anyone using this? is it worse than Fedora immutable?
为什么没人用这个?它比Fedora immutable差吗?
>>109420878
Less documentation and online support compared to fedora. They also got rid of the cool chameleon logo and go through constant weird rebrands and gimmicks for no reason. They claimed they were going to get rid of leap at some point but it hasn't happened yet so not sure what they're really doing or planning long-term, doesn't seem like they know either.
文档和在线支持比fedora少。他们还搞掉了酷炫的变色龙logo,莫名其妙地不停换品牌和搞噱头。他们声称某时要砍掉leap,但还没发生,所以不确定他们到底在干啥或长期计划啥,看起来他们自己也不知道。
The package manager is also horrible and extremely slow compared to other distros, like by a large margin. Really there's no reason to use it over fedora unless you just don't like redhat.
包管理器也很糟糕,比其他发行版慢得离谱,差距很大。真没什么理由用它而不选fedora,除非你就是不喜欢redhat。
>>109421324
>Really there's no reason to use it over fedora
>真没什么理由用它而不选fedora
Snapshots will rollback on non-immutable distro
快照可以在非不可变发行版上回滚
>>109422479
it's on fedora too doe, just not enabled ootb.
fedora上也有啊,只是默认没开。
desu as someone who tried both, in many flavors
说真话,我两个都试过很多版本
>read rpmfusion
>读rpmfusion
>clear and concise instructions
>清晰又简洁的说明
>read suse docs
>读suse文档
>get an aneurysm
>直接脑动脉瘤
And that's from someone who built BLFS many times. Holy shit fix your docs and package manager.
这还是来自一个建过多次BLFS的人。卧槽,修修你们的文档和包管理器吧。
(如果你觉得这篇文章有启发,可以点击这里付费)