Dropping $1000 on a flagship is just paying for a premium surveillance kit. Ultr

Dropping $1000 on a flagship is just paying for a premium surveillance kit. Ultra cheap phones are actually better for privacy precisely because they’re underpowered, sensor-starved pieces of junk, they literally lack the silicon to run the relentless, background AI scraping that Apple and Google rely on. Less tech, less tracking. Why is nobody talking about this?

花1000美元买旗舰机就是买个高级监控套件。其实超便宜的手机在隐私保护方面更好，正因为它们是性能不足、传感器匮乏的垃圾，它们 literally 缺乏硅片来运行 Apple 和 Google 依赖的那种无情的后台 AI 爬取。技术越少，追踪越少。为什么没人谈论这个？

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1784986306246843.jpg

>>109367291

People do use those phones. What do you expect from a tech enthusiast website??

人们确实在用那些手机。你指望一个科技爱好者网站能有什么反应？？

Motorola (Lenovo) has dominated the low end in the US for a few years now. Multiple carriers offer rebrands of overseas devices.

摩托罗拉（联想）在美国低端市场已经主导了好几年。多家运营商提供海外设备的贴牌版本。

It's just the average user of such devices are NOT going to be posting here.

使用这类设备的普通用户才不会发帖来这里。

>>109367291

I'm a poor fag and I have an Honor 400 that I am very happy with it. I don't see a point in spending a lot of money for a phone because things you can do with a phone are very limited and 300$ phone can do everything 1000$ phone can but 300$ computer can't do everything 1000$ computer can.

我是个穷逼，我有一台 Honor 400，我非常满意。我不觉得花大钱买手机有什么意义，因为手机能做的事情很有限，300刀的手机能做到的1000刀的手机都能做到，但300刀的电脑做不到的事，1000刀的电脑也未必能做到。