2026年7月30日 · 星期四
● 每日更新·改变自己
Eurekar·TOP
捕捉真实世界的英语信号
25信息来源
8,198精选文章
167单词卡片
18照片图片
全部6,459口语2,048免费395新闻1,599帖子1,379hackernews649techmeme455tmz451随笔323slashdot309外刊291arstechnica230techcrunch218Cards167simonwillison72动态69bloomberg54sethgodin43图片18youtube7

Leeeeeeeeeeroy

李——莱——尔——卢

4chan /g/ · Anonymous · 2026-07-25 02:16 · 20 帖 · 原文 ↗

← 上一篇返回列表下一篇 →
#1 Leeeeeeeeeeroy / 李——莱——尔——卢
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 02:16

Leeeeeeeeeeroy

李——莱——尔——卢

Jeeeeeeeenkins

杰西肯金斯

附件: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1784945790839017.mp4

#2 No.109364184
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 02:21

I will never forgive 4chan for shitting up video quality by enabling support for H.264 instead of AV1. Also spits in the face of every freetard on /g/ at the same time.

我永远不会原谅 4chan 通过支持 H.264 而不是 AV1 来搞砸视频画质。这也同时对 /g/ 板块上的所有“言论自由白痴”(freetard)啐了一口唾沫。

附件: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1784946078967557.webm

#3 No.109364227
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 02:32

>>109364184

Fixed it for you anon

已帮你修复,匿名者

附件: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1784946728346651.mp4

#4 No.109364244
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 02:35

>>109364184

It makes zero sense desu. No webp either. Even vp9 would heem this shit encoding.

这完全说不通啊 desu。连 webp 也没有。即使是 vp9 也会吊打这种烂编码。

#5 No.109364268
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 02:39

>>109364156

This looks fake, gay and AI generated.

这看起来造假、 gay 且由 AI 生成。

#6 No.109365124
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 05:39

>>109364244

Got it in vp9 for you anon, hopefully is easier to watch now

给你换成了 vp9 格式,匿名者,希望现在看起来更顺眼了

>>109364268

what are you talking about it's unitree this is what they do?

你在说什么啊,这是宇树(Unitree),这就是他们干的事吗?

附件: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1784957979055505.webm

#7 No.109365657
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 07:57

>>109365124

I can't fap to that, fuck off

我没法对着那玩意儿打飞机,滚蛋

#8 No.109365681
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 08:01

>>109364227

That actually looks like a real monke.

这看起来真像个真正的猴子。

#9 No.109365696
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 08:05

>>109364156

>unitree

>单树

It has neither 1 wheeled nor a tree.

它既没有单轮,也没有树。

#10 No.109366204
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 10:06

Gotta love how they always present these frolicking around and then couple years down the line they always just turn into literal killing machines.

真讨厌他们总是把这些东西展示得活蹦乱跳,但几年后它们总会变成真正的杀人机器。

#11 No.109366312
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 10:30

>>109365681

Would you like to be in a movie?

你想参演电影吗?

#12 No.109366330
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 10:33

>>109366204

stop asking women to lead. Women must be put back into strict patriarchy asap.

停止要求女性领导。必须尽快让女性重新回归严格的父权制。

#13 No.109366389
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 10:46

>>109366204

I'm actually surprised there are so few land based killing drones.

我其实很惊讶地面杀人无人机这么少。

I would think better range and ability to hide and lurk for days/weeks would make them a good supplement to flying killer drones.

我想,如果具备更远的射程以及数天/数周潜伏隐蔽的能力,它们会成为飞行杀人无人机的绝佳补充。

I think you could also make them autonomous quite easily: just make them creep up to anything human looking and give them a compass so they won't turn around and kill your own people.

我认为让它们实现自主性也很容易:只需让它们向任何看起来像人的目标靠近,并给它们装个指南针,这样它们就不会转身杀掉自己人。

#14 No.109366668
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 11:39

>>109364156

5 of them are racing towards you with guns and knife attachments, how do you survive?

五架带着枪械和刀架附件的无人机向你全速冲来,你怎么幸存?

#15 No.109366871
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 12:18

>>109366389

Ukraine has some that sit watch and take out troops

乌克兰有一些负责站岗并清除部队的无人机

They mostly use ground based drones for supplies and carrying out wounded from surrounded areas though. There's some cool videos, one operator was saying maybe a third actually get through but it's worth it compared to helping any other way

不过他们主要使用地面无人机运送补给和从被围困区域运送伤员。有一些很棒的视频,一位操作员说可能只有三分之一能成功穿过,但与其他救援方式相比,这仍然值得。

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1784981902944292.jpg

#16 No.109366874
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 12:19

>>109366668

do a 360 and moonwalk to the left at fast pace

快速向左旋转 360 度并滑步后退

#17 No.109367134
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 13:11

>>109364156

now attach a gun on that

现在在那上面装上枪

#18 No.109367153
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 13:13

>>109364156

Shieeeeeeet

我去

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1784985236886041.gif

#19 No.109367212
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 13:21

>>109366389

I guess humans are still a significantly cheaper resource to lose right now. One of those robots if captured or destroyed is like several families worth of people so it makes more sense to send humans into the danger until costs come down.

看来人类仍然是目前性价比更高的可损耗资源。如果那些机器人之一被俘或摧毁,相当于好几个家庭的人力损失,所以在成本降低之前,派人类进入危险区域似乎更合理。

#20 No.109367393
Anonymous · 2026-07-25 13:43

wut

乌特

图片: https://i.4cdn.org/g/1784987030197705.jpg

← 上一篇返回列表下一篇 →

(如果你觉得这篇文章有启发,可以点击这里付费