Kevin warsh thinks AI is deflationary which will lead to abundance in service and supplies because now robots mass produce for humans. Print baby print.
Kevin Warsh 认为 AI 具有通缩效应，这将导致服务和物资的丰富，因为现在机器人正在大规模为人类生产。印钱吧，赶紧印。
Kevin Warsh 认为 AI 具有通缩效应，这将导致服务产
Kevin warsh thinks AI is deflationary which will lead to abundance in service and supplies because now robots mass produce for humans. Print baby print.
Kevin Warsh 认为 AI 具有通缩效应，这将导致服务和物资的丰富，因为现在机器人正在大规模为人类生产。印钱吧，赶紧印。
>>62537378
It will soon be time to create memes about this guy.
是时候给这哥们搞点梗图了。
why these niggas trying to get him to raise rates
为什么这帮家伙想让他加息
>>62537378
He's just bending reality a little. Robots produce for a few humans, and less and less so. Mostly they produce for AI.
他只是稍微扭曲了一下现实。机器人为少数人类生产，而且越来越少。大多时候它们是为 AI 生产的。
You vill live in ze pod.
你们会住在胶囊舱里。
>>62537378
ah yes ai will only be as intelligent as we need it to be and will never get any more intelligent ever
是啊，AI 只会在我们需要的智能程度上保持智能，永远不会变得更聪明
>>62537378
Are the robots mass producing things in the room with us?
机器人正在和我们待在同一个房间里大规模生产东西吗？
>>62537632
It can be stupid as fuck, if it's cheaper doing economic tasks just well enough, we die off.
即使蠢得他妈离谱，如果它在经济任务上做得够便宜且“差不多”好，我们就会灭绝。
>>62537632
kinda yeah, an LLM is like a data structure where values are arranged by keys (tags), all values are connected by n degrees, and a program can compute transforms across connections to generate an output. We've extended this by providing more memory and "threads" in the form of agents, but the basic idea hasn't changed. Ultimately it just means that big tech has created the perfect tool for intellectual property theft, always following human innovation (and sometimes assisting it) but not really producing any of its own
有点像吧，LLM 就像一种数据结构，值按键（标签）排列，所有值都通过 n 度连接，程序可以计算连接上的变换以生成输出。我们通过提供代理形式的更多“线程”和“内存”来扩展它，但基本理念没变。归根结底，这意味着大型科技公司创造了完美的知识产权盗窃工具，总是紧跟人类创新（有时甚至辅助创新），但真正没有产生自己的任何东西。
>>62537430
He announced a meme task force last FOMC.
他在上次 FOMC 会议上宣布成立一个梗图工作组。
>>62537632
It can only ever be as intelligent as the people feeding it data, anon.
它永远只能像喂给它数据的人那么聪明，匿名者。
>>62537378
how will people buy product of robot take their job?
机器人抢了我们的工作，人们怎么买产品呢？
>>62537378
This guy's a fucking idiot. Everyone gave him the benefit of doubt last time but he really is just an idiot mouthpiece. At least Powell was coherent in his bullshittery, Warsh doesn't even try to hide trumps dick in his mouth
这哥们真是个 fuck 傻瓜。上次大家都对他抱有疑虑，但他真的只是个傻瓜传声筒。至少鲍威尔在他的胡扯中还能保持连贯，Warsh 甚至都不掩饰他在舔特朗普的鸡巴
>>62537378
>now robots mass produce for humans
>现在机器人正在为人类大规模生产
It's not polite to call Chinese people robots.
叫中国人机器人是不礼貌的。
（如果你觉得这篇文章有启发，可以点击这里付费）
