New child support question:

Got my filing. STBX is claiming he can't pay the state amount because of the kid he had with his GF.

我已提交申请。前夫声称他无法支付州政府规定的金额，因为他和前女友还有一个孩子。

However, he is paying for extra kid voluntarily, there is not child support filing for extra kid.

不过，他算是自愿多出钱养额外的孩子，并没有为这个额外的孩子单独提起子女抚养费的诉讼。

If I get mine in asap (which I plan to do) will that override his dispute for our kids?

如果我尽快拿到我的那份（我打算这么做），会不会覆盖掉他对我们孩子抚养费的争议？

He will claim X, Y, and Z. The judge will pretty much go by the well defined tables they use for child support.

他会主张X、Y和Z。法官基本上会按照他们使用的明确规定的子女抚养费表格来裁定。

The most important thing is that this is not something you want to be asking on the internet; talk to a lawyer. Every jurisdiction is different. You don't need to hire a lawyer for full representation, most will be more than happy to give you a legal opinion on this particular point for a few hundred dollars. If you think that's expensive just think the compounding cost of getting it wrong; the lawyer can tell you what to expect, what you should object, and how.

最重要的是，这不是你该在网上问的事；去找律师谈谈。每个司法辖区的规定都不一样。你不需要聘请律师全程代理，大多数律师都很乐意就这一点给你提供法律咨询，只需几百美元。如果你觉得这太贵了，想想搞错带来的累积成本吧；律师能告诉你预期是什么、你应该反对什么以及如何反对。

Judges normally don't care about the second family or second kid in a matter involving the first. In the end a support order has to be followed, and it is set by state standards calculated off of income(s) & number of kids in that matter. I am a little confused by your last statement, as I don't see what could be overridden.

法官通常不在意涉及第一家庭的事务中的第二个家庭或第二个孩子。最终必须遵守抚养令，而它是根据州标准计算的，该标准基于该案件中的收入和孩子数量。我对你的最后一句话有点困惑，因为我不明白什么会被覆盖。

"that matter"... ALL kids that the parent is responsible for are considered

“那个案件”……父母有责任抚养的所有孩子都会考虑在内。

most, maybe all, states have a maximum total one can pay for child support.and kids with others does reduce what another parent will receive.

大多数州，甚至所有州，都规定子女抚养费支付的最高总额。抚养其他孩子会减少另一位父母能收到的金额。

his paying child support isnt really "voluntary". it is basic responsibility that he pay. you calling it "voluntary" indicates a warped sense of fairness.

他支付子女抚养费并不算是“自愿”的。支付抚养费是他必须承担的基本责任。你称其为“自愿”表明你的公平观念扭曲了。

what is it about you that prevents you from agreeing to an amount that is needed?

你为什么无法同意一个必要的金额呢？

i have both paid support and collected support. from that viewpoint, child support "guidelines" are unfair. if you took a step back you'd see the inequity of the payments and that the one receiving payments generally receives more than is required... and fair

我既有付过抚养费，也有收过抚养费。从这个角度来看，子女抚养费“准则”是不公平的。如果你退一步看，就会看到支付的不平等，并且收到钱的一方通常收到的比所需的还多……而且这还算公平。